Originally posted by Aaqib
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sri Lanka Aviation
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by AF777 View PostThe first is in Parts arriving at TLS and the next two frames are close behind, parts for their third have been seen. MSN52 fuselage sections have been spotted in Station 59 yesterday. So 52 into FAL next week and 60 early March ?
We will see what happens !
Comment
-
Originally posted by LukeSkywalker View Post
The best UL can ever hope for now and offer is beating the Indian airlines by offering better service and connectivity and stealing traffic from India .... but I wouldn't hold my breath on itLast edited by Speedbird; 28-01-2016, 12:01 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by banuthev View PostOMG! What's going on with UL's A320s? Even yesterday 4R-ABP performing flight UL109/10 cameback to Colombo without landing Male'. Does anybody know the reason?
Comment
-
Hedging deal cost CPC over Rs. 9 billion loss: Auditor General
The Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) has incurred losses of more than Rs. 9 billion as a result of the disastrous hedging transactions, a report from the Auditor General’s Department says.
The CPC was cited as a party in arbitration proceedings pertaining to the hedging contracts entered into with several commercial banks.
In June 2013, US$ 60 million had been paid to the Standard Chartered Bank under a deed of settlement entered into between the parties.
“According to information made available, the total losses incurred by the Corporation as at 31 December 2014, including the travelling expenses of Rs. 5,261,827, was Rs. 9,780 million,” the report says.
Meanwhile, the Central Bank of Sri Lanka also incurred Rs. 571 million in legal expenses as a result of the hedging transactions. Of this, the CPC had reimbursed Rs. 568 million between 2011 and 2014.
“In addition to that, the CBSL had paid a sum of Rs. 379 million up to 31 December 2014 for the services obtained from the foreign lawyers who had appeared in the arbitration proceedings initiated by the Deutsche Bank against the Government of Sri Lanka,” the Auditor General’s report states.
The financial difficulties referred to include inefficiency of refinery operations with low margins, poor yields and frequent stoppages, resulting in importation of refined petroleum products to meet the demand of the country; provision of fuel to SriLankan Airlines and Mihin Lanka at concessionary rates which were lower than the contract customer price; poor maintenance of storage facilities.
The Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) has incurred losses of more than Rs. 9 billion as a result of the disastrous hedging transactions, a report from the
Taxpayers money must be spent in a way which guarantees the fullest possible benefit to the people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by shashikalakshan View PostThank you for the chance to gave me join this forum, That day declared the local standby for the 4R-ABP, reason is smoke in the cockpit
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheF15Ace View PostEmirates has announced a fifth flight to Colombo (except on Wednesday)adding more pressure to UL on the CMB-DXB route.
http://www.lankabusinessonline.com/e...ts-to-colombo/
Comment
-
Originally posted by banuthev View PostYou're welcome. Do you know why 4R-ABN was AOG in Kochi yesterday? Is UL still have plans to terminate flights to Rome, Paris and Frankfurt? I think UL should be continuing to serve Frankfurt.
Comment
-
What do you think of UL developing the route network as below?
Fleet
Full service carrier Fleet
A320 – 4 [140 SEATS]
A321 – 4 [185 SEATS]
A332 – 3 [265 SEATS]
A333 – 7 Brand new aircraft (297 SEATS) VERSION 1
A333 – 2 Second hand aircraft [316 SEATS] VERSION 2
A359 – 3 [348 SEATS]
Budget carrier Fleet
A321 – 2 [202 SEATS]
Network
CMB – NRT – 5 [A333 VERSION 1]
CMB – PEK – 7 [A332/A333 VERSION 1]
CMB – PVG – 5 [A332/A333 VERSION 1]
CMB – CAN – 7 [A332/A333 VERSION 1 & 2]
CMB – HKG – 5 [A332/A333 VERSION 1]
CMB – KMG – 4 [A320/1]
CMB – BKK – 7 X 2 [A333 VERSION 1 /A321]
CMB – KUL – 7 X 2 [A333 VERSION 1 /A321]
CMB – SIN – 7 X 2 [A333 VERSION 1]
CMB – CGK – 7 (HIGH DENSITY ,BUDGET CONFIG A321)
CMB – DAC – 7 + 4 [A321]
CMB – KTM – 4 (HIGH DENSITY ,BUDGET CONFIG A321)
CMB – GYA/VNS – 2 (HIGH DENSITY ,BUDGET CONFIG A321)
CMB – DEL – 7 [A320/A321]
CMB – LHE – 7 [A320/A321]
CMB – KHI – 7 [A320/A321]
CMB – BOM – 7 [A320/A321]
CMB – CCU – 3 [A320/A321]
CMB – VTZ – 7 [A320/A321]
CMB – MAA – 7 X 4 [A321,A333 VERSION 2]
CMB – BLR – 7 X 2 [A321/ A333 VERSION 2]
CMB – TRZ – 7 X 2 [A321]
CMB – IXM – 7 [A321]
CMB – TRV – 7 X 2 [A321]
CMB – COK – 7 [A321]
CMB – GOI – 7 [A320]
CMB – MLE – 7 X 5 [A321, A333 VERSION 1 AND VERSION 2]
CMB – SEZ – 5 [A320]
CMB – MCT – 7 (HIGH DENSITY ,BUDGET CONFIG A321)
CMB – AUH – 7 [A321]
CMB – DXB – 7 [A333 VERSION 1 & VERSION 2]
CMB – BAH – 7 (HIGH DENSITY ,BUDGET CONFIG A321)
CMB – DOH – 7 [A332/A333 VERSION 1 & VERSION 2]
CMB – DMM – 7 [A332/A333 VERSION 2]
CMB – RUH – 7 [A332/A333 VERSION 2]
CMB – JED – 7 [A332/A333 VERSION 2]
CMB - KWI - 7 [A332/A333 VERSION 2]
CMB – LHR – 7 [A359]
CMB – FRA – YYZ – 4 [A359]
Comment
-
Originally posted by banuthev View PostWhat do you think of UL developing the route network as below?
No alternative but to cut routes in a desperate attempt to reduce losses (another epic fail...).
The Management of the Airline are mostly political appointees - their function is to rubber stamp whatever the GOSL decrees and keep the funds flowing to family, friends and cronies.
Any efforts to investigate obvious theft, fraud and abuse of power have been blocked.
Rampant corruption and incompetence at all levels within the Airline. I've explained how it works at the office.
There's only one way this ends imho.
This was the situation at Flight Ops in 2013 when I left. The holes really were lining up - somehow they managed to avoid an accident.
Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business
Comment
-
Originally posted by banuthev View PostWhat do you think of UL developing the route network as below?
CMB – FRA – YYZ – 4 [A359]
YYZ or any North American destination for that matter will be a colossal mistake. Long Haul (especially ULH) are notoriously difficult to turn a profit out of and bigger players than UL also burnt badly, trying.
UL has no choice, but to discontinue the three continental European destinations immediately and perhaps increase the frequency to LHR (slot permitting). I know they operate like 10 weekly flights, perhaps they should make it double daily.
UL really has to focus on regional flying and strengthen their presence in China and India.
Comment
Comment