Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • banuthev
    Administrator
    • Dec 2010
    • 3945

    #4981
    Originally posted by 4R-ALA
    is 4r-alc in hangar now for retrofittation?? cz no movements since 08dec
    4R-ALC is flying as normal - http://www.flightradar24.com/reg/4r-alc

    Comment

    • Sali
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2014
      • 15

      #4982
      Originally posted by banuthev
      Good news! i think SriLankan has to increase more flights to their existing destinations : Beijing, Shanghai and they should consider flying nonstop flights to Guangzhou. Nishantha said to TTG Asia, that SriLankan Airlines is waiting for the delivery of new aircraft before embarking on major expansion plans in Australia, China and India. SriLankan is planning to add two more destinations in China to it's network. Not sure about the name of those two new destinations and when they are going to be launched. SriLankan planning to double the frequency to Delhi and Mumbai and contemplating to resume flights to Melbourne and Sydney from next year. SriLankan better take advantage of China routes before other airlines take even more advantage. SriLankan currently have China flights as below

      CMB-PEK-___ - 2 WEEKLY
      CMB-PVG-___ - 2 WEEKLY
      CMB-KMG-___ - 3 WEEKLY
      CMB-CKG-___ - 1 WEEKLY (seasonal)
      CMB-HRI-PEK - 2 WEEKLY
      CMB-HRI-PVG - 2 WEEKLY
      CMB-BKK-CAN - 4 WEEKLY
      CMB-BKK-HKG - 3 WEEKLY
      I think they should stop flying via HRI. May be the reason for Guangzhou flight via BKK load factor its not like PEK,PVG load factor is bit less

      Comment

      • banuthev
        Administrator
        • Dec 2010
        • 3945

        #4983
        Originally posted by Sali
        I think they should stop flying via HRI. May be the reason for Guangzhou flight via BKK load factor its not like PEK,PVG load factor is bit less
        Yeah we wish but I doubt they will stop flying via HRI because SL GOV are trying to keep the aircraft movements at HRI and they are trying to mull the traffic of Maldives-China via HRI. Perhaps UL have to increase the frequency of Colombo nonstop flights to/from Beijing and Shanghai.

        Comment

        • Serendib
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 1807

          #4984
          Does anybody know the current situation of Mattala Airport? has it started making profit? Names of the airline operating over there? any ideas how to make Mattala airport succesfull?

          Comment

          • flylanka
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2014
            • 100

            #4985
            HRI Airport

            Originally posted by Serendib
            Does anybody know the current situation of Mattala Airport? has it started making profit? Names of the airline operating over there? any ideas how to make Mattala airport succesfull?
            I don't believe any airline other than UL and Fly Dubai operate there on a regular schedule. There may be a some charters calling in. Don't think it is profitable by a long shot. To make it profitable. I would like to see the initial business plan for HRI if there is one.

            Comment

            • Rainer
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2013
              • 26

              #4986
              Originally posted by Serendib
              Names of the airline operating over there?
              Take a look http://www.airport.lk/hia/MRIA_FLT_SCHED_Nov_2014.pdf

              Comment

              • anthonylk
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2014
                • 128

                #4987
                SriLankan Airlines has loaded preliminary schedule for Winter 2015/16 season into the GDS, which sees Colombo – London Heathrow route scheduled to be operated by the new A330-300 only, from 25OCT15. Currently the oneWorld member operates a mix of A330-200 and A340-300 aircraft.

                Note the schedule listed below is preliminary, which means additional changes may occur, such as moving forward planned A330-300 service to Summer season.

                UL505 CMB0225 – 0845LHR 333 67
                UL503 CMB1300 – 1920LHR 333 D

                UL506 LHR1235 – 0435+1CMB 333 67
                UL504 LHR2050 – 1250+1CMB 333 D

                Routes is the home of the world’s leading aviation network development conferences and events. Plus aviation news and features, and profiles of global airlines and airports.

                Comment

                • ejanson65
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 628

                  #4988
                  Originally posted by Serendib
                  Does anybody know the current situation of Mattala Airport? has it started making profit? Names of the airline operating over there? any ideas how to make Mattala airport succesfull?
                  10 Commercial flights/week and the rest are done for political reasons.

                  I met a Captain in Jeddah recently. They operated CMB-HRI-JED. Nobody got off and nobody got on in HRI. Waste of fuel and one extra cycle on the aircraft.

                  Epic Fail!

                  HRI was built for all the wrong reasons and will never be more than an incredible waste of public funds imho.

                  Best option - close it! There is no way to make this profitable.

                  Since there is no TAF (forecast) published for this airport it cannot be legally be used as an alternate for CMB.
                  Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

                  Comment

                  • banuthev
                    Administrator
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 3945

                    #4989
                    Originally posted by ejanson65
                    10 Commercial flights/week and the rest are done for political reasons.

                    I met a Captain in Jeddah recently. They operated CMB-HRI-JED. Nobody got off and nobody got on in HRI. Waste of fuel and one extra cycle on the aircraft.

                    Epic Fail!

                    HRI was built for all the wrong reasons and will never be more than an incredible waste of public funds imho.

                    Best option - close it! There is no way to make this profitable.

                    Since there is no TAF (forecast) published for this airport it cannot be legally be used as an alternate for CMB.
                    In my opinion HRI is suitable ONLY for MRO facility and flight training schools.. There were plans to build a LH Aircraft Engineering (MRO) facilities at HRI ? not sure what's a latest update on that. They should cancel all the regular flights operating via HRI. Waste of Money!

                    Mihin, SriLankan to trim losses - http://www.nation.lk/edition/biz-new...im-losses.html

                    Comment

                    • Speedbird
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2012
                      • 616

                      #4990
                      Originally posted by banuthev
                      In my opinion HRI is suitable ONLY for MRO facility and flight training schools.. There were plans to build a LH Aircraft Engineering (MRO) facilities at HRI ? not sure what's a latest update on that. They should cancel all the regular flights operating via HRI. Waste of Money!

                      Mihin, SriLankan to trim losses - http://www.nation.lk/edition/biz-new...im-losses.html
                      Well MRO would be very difficult unless facilities in city of Hambantota develop...like good schools, living standard etc...There is a human element as well License AC Engineers are in demand...They dont want to live in a place where they cannot have a good living standard.

                      MJ and UL should be trimming losses; today Oil is at less than US $60 (WTI)

                      Comment

                      • ejanson65
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2013
                        • 628

                        #4991
                        Originally posted by Speedbird
                        MJ and UL should be trimming losses; today Oil is at less than US $60 (WTI)
                        The published annual report for UL shows fuel costs decreased last year but losses increased

                        They continually talk about cost cutting but the losses have increased year after year. There is a very nice chart in the annual report that shows this.

                        There is a complete disconnect between what is said and what actually happens.
                        Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

                        Comment

                        • 4R-ADA
                          Member
                          • Mar 2012
                          • 30

                          #4992
                          Originally posted by ejanson65
                          10 Commercial flights/week and the rest are done for political reasons.

                          I met a Captain in Jeddah recently. They operated CMB-HRI-JED. Nobody got off and nobody got on in HRI. Waste of fuel and one extra cycle on the aircraft.

                          Epic Fail!

                          HRI was built for all the wrong reasons and will never be more than an incredible waste of public funds imho.

                          Best option - close it! There is no way to make this profitable.

                          Since there is no TAF (forecast) published for this airport it cannot be legally be used as an alternate for CMB.
                          Totally agree. I am really really surprised that these CMB/HRI tags are even in place with wide body aircraft.
                          The only way this airport can work is:

                          1) Attract seasonal charter traffic - surely the likes of Condor, Thomson, Edelweiss etc etc can be enticed? What about those airlines from Siberia? They often have winter charters to Thailand, Philippines etc.
                          2) Attract low cost airlines - surely Tiger Air, Air Asia could be enticed.
                          3) Make it the home base of Mihin - low-cost airline from a different base to differentiate it from CMB/UL. Means MJ should not be using CMB at all.

                          I guess if the highway between Hambantota to Colombo was complete, that would make it a lot more accessible as an alternate airport for the southern region of Sri Lanka.

                          Comment

                          • Haleef
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2012
                            • 1468

                            #4993
                            *Good News *

                            The 2nd brand new A330 - 300 will depart Toulouse in France as UL 1206 on the 19th Dec 2014 on its delivery voyage to land at BIA.
                            Haleef Ismail
                            www.youtube.com/haleef1 | www.instagram.com/cmb_spotter

                            Comment

                            • channa
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2013
                              • 230

                              #4994
                              Originally posted by ejanson65
                              The published annual report for UL shows fuel costs decreased last year but losses increased

                              They continually talk about cost cutting but the losses have increased year after year. There is a very nice chart in the annual report that shows this.

                              There is a complete disconnect between what is said and what actually happens.
                              As long as government keeps hand on it, UL and MJ won't be able to make profits. Nowadays more airlines make profit due to low fuel prices. Air Canada is a good example. They are progressing well and expanding routes rapidly with new air crafts.

                              Comment

                              • flylanka
                                Senior Member
                                • Jul 2014
                                • 100

                                #4995
                                No It is not..... Expanding network is not starting destinations for the sake of it. Focus should be turning UL around to a profit with existing network.. may be right down-sizing for that matter. UL plays in a market with low yields hence have to be careful in network plans.

                                Comment

                                Working...