Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AirCeylon
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 70

    #5101
    Originally posted by banuthev
    Are there any under-performing routes in the UL network (in terms of yields and passenger loads)?
    Fco

    And would like to know what was wrong in mxp to suspend operations when someone told me that mxp was better than fco...in pax loads cargo and as well for ex's baggage

    Comment

    • Srilankan1
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 499

      #5102
      Hope New Government will shut down Mihinlanka soon and merged with UL and appoint a new management to run Airline to a profitable one.

      Comment

      • Azamh
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 246

        #5103
        Originally posted by Srilankan1
        Hope New Government will shut down Mihinlanka soon and merged with UL and appoint a new management to run Airline to a profitable one.
        Yes because chairman and ceo has runaway without documentations what a joke

        Comment

        • lordvader
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 366

          #5104
          Originally posted by Azamh
          Yes because chairman and ceo has runaway without documentations what a joke
          Some interesting articles (the first one seems to confirm the Chairman & CEO have resigned). Won't post them in full since the information in the articles may not be fully verified.





          Not sure if its true but apparently the old UL CEO (from EK times) is still in Sri Lanka. If its actually true I wonder if they'll approach him for another stint at UL (although I doubt he'll take it after he was treated). Even Harry J wouldn't be bad as Chairman.
          Last edited by lordvader; 13-01-2015, 08:07 AM.

          Comment

          • 4R-ADA
            Member
            • Mar 2012
            • 30

            #5105
            Originally posted by lordvader
            Not sure if its true but apparently the old UL CEO (from EK times) is still in Sri Lanka. If its actually true I wonder if they'll approach him for another stint at UL (although I doubt he'll take it after he was treated). Even Harry J wouldn't be bad as Chairman.
            Indeed. According to linkedin he is an aviation consultant in Colombo for a company called International Airlines & Aviation.

            Comment

            • ejanson65
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2013
              • 628

              #5106
              Originally posted by lordvader
              Not sure if its true but apparently the old UL CEO (from EK times) is still in Sri Lanka. If its actually true I wonder if they'll approach him for another stint at UL (although I doubt he'll take it after he was treated). Even Harry J wouldn't be bad as Chairman.
              Peter Hill is indeed enjoying retirement in Sri Lanka. His wife is Sri Lankan.

              He was treated like **** by the previous GOSL - fired for an incident in London that got way out of hand. He is owed an apology.

              After the way he was treated I doubt he will be back.
              Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

              Comment

              • kennny15
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2013
                • 164

                #5107
                http://www.srilankan.com/corporate/e...irline/profile


                acording to the webside Mr. Nishantha Wickremasinghe is the Chairman

                Comment

                • umedhah
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 601

                  #5108
                  Why UL using the new birds such as 4R-ALL and ALM on routs such as HRI, PEK and the Middle East? They Should be using these new birds on Far East and Europe where we have more profitable turnarounds?

                  The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

                  The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.
                  ​Umedha Hettigoda ®

                  https://banners-my.flightradar24.com/umedhah.png

                  Comment

                  • Speedbird
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2012
                    • 616

                    #5109
                    Any news on 4R-ALN

                    Comment

                    • Serendib
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 1848

                      #5110
                      Originally posted by Speedbird
                      Any news on 4R-ALN
                      4R- SriLankan Airlines Airbus A330-343 - cn 1604

                      Airframe Details
                      Construction Number (MSN) 1604
                      Aircraft Type Airbus A330-343
                      Test registration F-WWCP
                      Airframe Status On Order

                      Comment

                      • lordvader
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2011
                        • 366

                        #5111
                        Originally posted by kennny15
                        http://www.srilankan.com/corporate/e...irline/profile


                        acording to the webside Mr. Nishantha Wickremasinghe is the Chairman
                        Yes and the website hasn't been updated recently, has it? We should maybe see some details fairly soon if there are any management changes.
                        Last edited by lordvader; 15-01-2015, 10:32 AM.

                        Comment

                        • Srilankan1
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 499

                          #5112
                          Originally posted by umedhah
                          Why UL using the new birds such as 4R-ALL and ALM on routs such as HRI, PEK and the Middle East? They Should be using these new birds on Far East and Europe where we have more profitable turnarounds?

                          The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

                          http://www.flightradar24.com/reg/4rall
                          I was thinking the same Umedha. to use those new birds on ME routes is terrible.

                          Comment

                          • ejanson65
                            Senior Member
                            • Jul 2013
                            • 628

                            #5113
                            Originally posted by umedhah
                            Why UL using the new birds such as 4R-ALL and ALM on routs such as HRI, PEK and the Middle East? They Should be using these new birds on Far East and Europe where we have more profitable turnarounds?
                            A333 is not a long haul aircraft - it is designed for short and medium length routes. UL bought these aircraft as an A332 replacement.

                            A350 is supposed to replace A343.

                            Operating A333 to London can only be done with payload restrictions - London flight can be as long as 12 hours in the Winter months.

                            Even the A343 has payload restrictions to London in the Winter months.

                            UL has the 260000kg version of the A343 (except for - ADG)- my Airline has the 275000kg version of the A343 with the 190000kg landing weight option.

                            When I flew CMB-LHR-CMB the westbound flights were at maximum weight. Eastbound we didn't reach maximum landing weight until 90 minutes from CMB.

                            These flights were full - they should have been profitable. London is a premium route for every Airline - except UL.

                            The entire sales/marketing/commercial departments need to be investigated. What is needed is accountability!


                            Regarding the integration of UL/Mihin - terrible idea!

                            You'd saddle UL with all of Mihin's debts and long term liabilities - UL is already a financial disaster.

                            There are people at Mihin who were not re-hired by UL.

                            There are people working at Mihin who failed the selection at UL.

                            I don't see any benefit to merging the 2 companies - hope it doesn't happen.
                            Last edited by ejanson65; 15-01-2015, 08:28 AM. Reason: added details
                            Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

                            Comment

                            • 4R-ADA
                              Member
                              • Mar 2012
                              • 30

                              #5114
                              Originally posted by ejanson65
                              A333 is not a long haul aircraft - it is designed for short and medium length routes. UL bought these aircraft as an A332 replacement.

                              A350 is supposed to replace A343.

                              Operating A333 to London can only be done with payload restrictions - London flight can be as long as 12 hours in the Winter months.

                              Even the A343 has payload restrictions to London in the Winter months.

                              UL has the 260000kg version of the A343 (except for - ADG)- my Airline has the 275000kg version of the A343 with the 190000kg landing weight option.

                              When I flew CMB-LHR-CMB the westbound flights were at maximum weight. Eastbound we didn't reach maximum landing weight until 90 minutes from CMB.

                              These flights were full - they should have been profitable. London is a premium route for every Airline - except UL.

                              The entire sales/marketing/commercial departments need to be investigated. What is needed is accountability!

                              Regarding the integration of UL/Mihin - terrible idea!

                              You'd saddle UL with all of Mihin's debts and long term liabilities - UL is already a financial disaster.

                              There are people at Mihin who were not re-hired by UL.

                              There are people working at Mihin who failed the selection at UL.

                              I don't see any benefit to merging the 2 companies - hope it doesn't happen.
                              As much as Mihin Lanka should be shut down, what is the likelihood of UL taking over certain destinations, which for MJ were doing ok, namely Dhaka and Jakarta.
                              Not sure if Seychelles or Lahore are actually worth pursuing or not. They do seem kind of promising in the long term. Medan, on the other hand, should be given the chop. I have never really understood the rationale with Medan.

                              Comment

                              • Azamh
                                Senior Member
                                • Apr 2011
                                • 246

                                #5115
                                I recently flew cme kul ul315 business class a320 uncomfortable food and service is excellent 737 mph seats better than a320
                                For short haul like chennai Karachi they use a321 they should use a321 to kul and sin a321 business class better than a320 Hope they have some food change in future also they should stop giving China promotions like usd 500 Guangzhou cmb guangzhou inc 3 night hotel from hk run ticket costs usd700 plus

                                Comment

                                Working...