Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sandaru
    Administrator
    • Oct 2015
    • 361

    #6421
    Sri Lanka has approved a Bilateral Air Service Agreement with Serbia. Under the deal, designated airlines from both countries, which include Air Serbia, SriLankan Airlines and Mihin Lanka, can operate up to seven weekly flights between the two countries using third and fourth freedom rights. Additionally, Air Serbia has been approved fifth freedom rights if it uses a new airport on the island's south that has failed to draw customers. The Sri Lankan government's spokesman, Rajitha Senaratne, said the Bilateral Air Service Agreement between Sri Lanka and Serbia would help develop air services and tourism. “Especially, Mattala International Airport can be used by allowing Serbian aircraft to fly to other countries”, he told a news conference. Mattala Airport has been criticised for its inability to draw airlines several years after being built with Chinese loans. The agreement also allows airlines from each country to operate unrestricted passenger charter flights between Sri Lanka and Serbia.

    Source - www.exyuaviation.com http://www.exyuaviation.com/p/serbia...teral-air.html

    Comment

    • Speedbird
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 616

      #6422
      Originally posted by ecureilx
      I am not sure what you said there, but I totally agree with you
      Nice one LMAO

      Comment

      • Speedbird
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 616

        #6423
        Originally posted by edthenna
        ...
        I propose members to rethink my argument....did they really lose their Frequent flyers of Europe & North America to ME3 carriers or not? I know they lost, and what number of them were premium travelers? Did UL gain back those lost to their current frequent flyer program?...
        Loss of UL Premium passengers; was mainly due to quality of the product and service was not par with ME3 or any Asian airlines.

        Comment

        • Aaqib
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 474

          #6424
          SriLankan Airlines to begin flights to Vishakapatnam

          SriLankan Airlines would be starting a scheduled service to Vishakapatnam commencing on the 15th of February 2016

          Today’s News Headlines, Explore the latest news, opinions, and features from New Indian Express. Stay informed with breaking news, in-depth coverage, and expert perspectives on various topics.
          Last edited by Aaqib; 18-11-2015, 02:11 PM. Reason: Additional data
          - Aaqib Hussain
          http://www.youtube.com/@theflyinglankan

          Comment

          • banuthev
            Administrator
            • Dec 2010
            • 4010

            #6425
            Originally posted by Aaqib
            SriLankan Airlines would be starting a scheduled service to Vishakapatnam commencing on the 15th of February 2016

            http://www.newindianexpress.com/stat...cle2908171.ece
            Thanks for the news! Wow! How did you findout UL to commence VTZ flights from 15 Feb 2016. Good to hear its going to be finally materialised but They have been planning this route for over 2 years.

            Comment

            • banuthev
              Administrator
              • Dec 2010
              • 4010

              #6426
              Originally posted by RAHALROXZ
              Hello
              As you may already know it is now flying to heathrow under UL503
              I don't think they will expans the network because there is no addition to the fleet in fact as another aircraft is about to e taken away from the service. ALG lease return check is
              Scheduled to be started by 15th of December... ADF was in hangar for a couple of weeks and now she is about to rejoin the fleet and will fly until late January as far as I kmow ( or probably until ALG is finished) ...
              Cheers
              Is 4R-ALG going to be scrapped? Can't UL be able to extend the lease agreements for those A332s if they are in the flying condition for next few years? UL recently announced they will cancel the european routes (exc LHR) so no point of having A350 in the fleet when they have a very few long haul routes. So I feel that UL better delay the A350 deliveries until they back to normal. May be those 3 A350 ordered from ILFC should be cancelled or changed to A332s instead of A350s. UL should be taking the direct orders of 4 A350 from Airbus to avoid the heavy penalty charges for cancelling the order. In my humble opinion only LHR & NRT are capable of meeting the demand of UL's A350 other long haul routes easily be served by A332/A333s.

              Comment

              • abhijith16
                Junior Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 22

                #6427
                Originally posted by Aaqib
                SriLankan Airlines would be starting a scheduled service to Vishakapatnam commencing on the 15th of February 2016

                http://www.newindianexpress.com/stat...cle2908171.ece
                I hope UL takes their word with Indian expansion, and adds IXE, PNQ, AMD and resume their old CJB & CCJ flights. There's so much potential for SriLankan to take this traffic now that India is tightening bilateral expansion.

                Comment

                • Aaqib
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2013
                  • 474

                  #6428
                  Saudia to Commence JED-MLE-CMB Route

                  SV JED-CMB to operate via MLE but without 5th freedom rights.
                  Saudia in summer 2016 season is introducing scheduled operation to Maldives, on board 341-seater (J14Y327) Boeing 777-200ER aircraft. From 30MAR16, the Skyteam member will be offering twice weekly operation on Jeddah – Male – Colombo route, operating on Wednesdays and Sundays.
                  SV786 JED0035 – 0805MLE0925 – 1130CMB 772 37
                  SV787 CMB1310 – 1410MLE1530 – 1915JED 772 37


                  Last edited by Aaqib; 19-11-2015, 03:00 AM.
                  - Aaqib Hussain
                  http://www.youtube.com/@theflyinglankan

                  Comment

                  • Aaqib
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 474

                    #6429
                    Originally posted by abhijith16
                    I hope UL takes their word with Indian expansion, and adds IXE, PNQ, AMD and resume their old CJB & CCJ flights. There's so much potential for SriLankan to take this traffic now that India is tightening bilateral expansion.
                    I agree with you....they should benefit quite a bit from increasing frequencies to the Indian Sub-continent.....they should also take GOI and HYD into consideration
                    @abhijith16 any information on the re-naming of the TRZ airport?
                    - Aaqib Hussain
                    http://www.youtube.com/@theflyinglankan

                    Comment

                    • abhijith16
                      Junior Member
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 22

                      #6430
                      Originally posted by Aaqib
                      I agree with you....they should benefit quite a bit from increasing frequencies to the Indian Sub-continent.....they should also take GOI and HYD into consideration
                      @abhijith16 any information on the re-naming of the TRZ airport?
                      Yes yes, HYD, PNQ, AMD has to be timed to connect to Southeast Asia, while IXE, CCJ, CJB, GOI should be timed to both GCC and Southeast Asia. SriLankan has to reinvigorate the old India strategy.

                      P.S - I don't think they are renaming TRZ at all.
                      Last edited by abhijith16; 19-11-2015, 04:48 AM.

                      Comment

                      • 4R-ALA
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2013
                        • 383

                        #6431
                        QR A321 A7-AIB has positioned itself to shannon as per QR SOURCE.COM. Is this by any chance the 3rd A321 for UL??

                        Comment

                        • abhijith16
                          Junior Member
                          • Jun 2011
                          • 22

                          #6432
                          Originally posted by 4R-ALA
                          QR A321 A7-AIB has positioned itself to shannon as per QR SOURCE.COM. Is this by any chance the 3rd A321 for UL??
                          It says it's headed for Maintenance, so probably not.

                          Comment

                          • 4R-ALA
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2013
                            • 383

                            #6433
                            Originally posted by abhijith16
                            It says it's headed for Maintenance, so probably not.
                            But as per QR SOURCE.COM, a321 a7-aia had maintenance done in Doha itself. hence thats why i was wondering.

                            Comment

                            • mohamed_naqeeb
                              Junior Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 19

                              #6434
                              Originally posted by banuthev
                              Is 4R-ALG going to be scrapped? Can't UL be able to extend the lease agreements for those A332s if they are in the flying condition for next few years? UL recently announced they will cancel the european routes (exc LHR) so no point of having A350 in the fleet when they have a very few long haul routes. So I feel that UL better delay the A350 deliveries until they back to normal. May be those 3 A350 ordered from ILFC should be cancelled or changed to A332s instead of A350s. UL should be taking the direct orders of 4 A350 from Airbus to avoid the heavy penalty charges for cancelling the order. In my humble opinion only LHR & NRT are capable of meeting the demand of UL's A350 other long haul routes easily be served by A332/A333s.

                              Comment

                              • channa
                                Senior Member
                                • May 2013
                                • 231

                                #6435
                                Originally posted by abhijith16
                                I hope UL takes their word with Indian expansion, and adds IXE, PNQ, AMD and resume their old CJB & CCJ flights. There's so much potential for SriLankan to take this traffic now that India is tightening bilateral expansion.
                                Lots of South Indian passengers fly to Europe via CMB. If UL cancels most of their European routes,then it will affect Indian routes also according to my opinion.
                                Last edited by channa; 19-11-2015, 11:59 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...