Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Max
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 919

    #7036
    Would prospective investors want any truck with SriLankan?

    Minister of Public Enterprise Development, Kabir Hashim, said that financially no prospective investor would want to be part of SriLankan Airlines, which has been mismanaged and virtually run to the ground.

    The incumbent Chairman did not inherit a viable organization, but one riddled with corruption, nepotism, and inefficiency. The national carrier was no longer an envious brand to be part of, he noted.

    The minister was speaking as the chief guest at the graduation ceremony of the SriLankan Aviation College in Colombo last week.

    "Years of misplaced priorities and wasteful expenditure continued to place a heavy burden on the economy of the country. An Airline had to project the image of the country. It was because of the industriousness of those who continued to serve SriLankan, the brand was able to hold its prestige in the skies", he said.

    This mismanagement has to stop. The airline will be diverted towards profit orientation than be allowed to continue its dependence on government hand–outs, the minister stressed.

    Air travel has increased across the world. More and more people travel on holiday world-wide. It’s a growing phenomenon. With such positive factors, SriLanka should also be able to attract people to travel and take advantage of reduced air fares due low oil prices, minister Hashim noted.

    Most other international air carriers operated at a profit. There was no reason that SriLankan too could not be placed within such profit oriented organizations, he said.

    There will be a time-frame for reorganization of the airline, and it would be turned around to make profits. State patronage would stop. It would then be that the airline would be on its own and contribute towards economy of the country, the minister said.

    Comment

    • Max
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 919

      #7037
      CPC will supply fuel until Sri Lankan is privatised

      The Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) has been instructed to continue to provide fuel to the loss-making SriLankan Airlines despite the outstanding bills running to more than Rs 8,000 million, with the Treasury paying up the bills, officials said.

      The decision was taken this week at a meeting attended by Petroleum Minister Chandima Weerakkody and officials of the Treasury, the CPC and SriLankan Airlines to discuss the repayment of outstanding debts.

      Mr. Weerakkody said that in view of the decision the CPC had extended the credit period by a month. We cannot continuously take over the loss as it is turning out to be a burden on the CPC,” he said.

      State Finance Minister Lakshman Yapa Abeywardena said that with the plans to privatize the management of the SriLankan Airlines which has incurred a loss of nearly Rs. one billion, the Treasury would be able to make the repayments to the CPC.

      The CPC now pays up to Rs. 1,200 million to two state banks as loan instalments for fuel imports.

      The Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) has been instructed to continue to provide fuel to the loss-making SriLankan Airlines despite the outstanding bills

      Comment

      • A350-XWB
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2016
        • 18

        #7038
        OK, it seems UL will cancel the A350s it ordered directly:

        Comment

        • TheF15Ace
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2016
          • 113

          #7039
          Originally posted by A350-XWB
          OK, it seems UL will cancel the A350s it ordered directly:

          http://in.reuters.com/article/sri-la...-idINL3N17T2HM
          Well can't say this was a surprise. Disappointing, but with the current situation it's the most realistic solution.

          Comment

          • lordvader
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 366

            #7040
            Sri Lanka govt to take-over state airlines debt; seek managing investor: PM
            Apr 26, 2016 13:08 PM GMT+0530 | 0 Comment(s)

            ECONOMYNEXT - Sri Lanka's government will strengthen the balance sheet of debt-ridden SriLankan Airlines by taking over some of its debt and seek a partner who can manage and invest in the airline, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said.

            SriLankan will also seek to cancel the four aircraft ordered from Airbus, where production has not yet started, he told reporters in Colombo.

            He said SriLankan Airlines was a 'landmine' for the economy. SriLankan had total debts of 3.2 billion dollars, he said.

            The government will have to take over debt and strengthen its balance sheet.

            The government was seeking an international airline partner or an investor, Prime Minister Wickremesinghe said.

            Request for proposals will be called he said.

            Without reducing its debt, no partner will be willing to take it over, analysts say.

            Minister Sarath Amugunugama said the cabinet of ministers had decided to seek an international partner to avoid having to close down the airline.

            Prime Minister Wickremesinghe said some of the losses of budget carrier Mihin Lanka was hidden inside SriLankan and the two airlines.

            Having a plan to fix the state airlines is believed to be a 'prior action' to under a strategy developed with the International Monetary Fund to fix Sri Lanka's broken state finances.





            Mihin needs to be split from UL and a stake should be offered to a international low cost operator or investor like Indigo Partners. Genuine competition between 2 well managed airlines would be good for Sri Lankan aviation.

            Comment

            • ejanson65
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2013
              • 628

              #7041
              All of the above is just talk and wishful thinking imho.

              Since the new GOSL was elected nothing whatsover has been done at UL.

              Company culture - no change. No effort to change anything
              Corruption/Nepotism - business as usual. No effort to do anything.
              Investigations - going nowhere. Just more talk.

              Not a single person has been arrested - former COO Druvi and HHR Pradeepa continue to be employed despite being guilty of abuse of power.

              It's a disaster for the people of Sri Lanka while the Politicians, their family, friends and cronies pocket $$$ millions.

              You cannot operate a business like this - you certainly can't ever make money.

              Nobody will invest - what possible reason is there to get entangled in this mess? Easier to start anew Airline (cheaper too!).

              Bankruptcy is the only option.
              Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

              Comment

              • LukeSkywalker
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2011
                • 188

                #7042
                Originally posted by lordvader
                Sri Lanka govt to take-over state airlines debt; seek managing investor: PM
                Apr 26, 2016 13:08 PM GMT+0530 | 0 Comment(s)

                ECONOMYNEXT - Sri Lanka's government will strengthen the balance sheet of debt-ridden SriLankan Airlines by taking over some of its debt and seek a partner who can manage and invest in the airline, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said.

                SriLankan will also seek to cancel the four aircraft ordered from Airbus, where production has not yet started, he told reporters in Colombo.

                He said SriLankan Airlines was a 'landmine' for the economy. SriLankan had total debts of 3.2 billion dollars, he said.

                The government will have to take over debt and strengthen its balance sheet.

                The government was seeking an international airline partner or an investor, Prime Minister Wickremesinghe said.

                Request for proposals will be called he said.

                Without reducing its debt, no partner will be willing to take it over, analysts say.

                Minister Sarath Amugunugama said the cabinet of ministers had decided to seek an international partner to avoid having to close down the airline.

                Prime Minister Wickremesinghe said some of the losses of budget carrier Mihin Lanka was hidden inside SriLankan and the two airlines.

                Having a plan to fix the state airlines is believed to be a 'prior action' to under a strategy developed with the International Monetary Fund to fix Sri Lanka's broken state finances.





                Mihin needs to be split from UL and a stake should be offered to a international low cost operator or investor like Indigo Partners. Genuine competition between 2 well managed airlines would be good for Sri Lankan aviation.
                Mihin should be just shut down; better to have one bankrupt airline than two. I never understood the business case for Mihin other than having an airline in our old 'beloved leader's' name.

                It's a given that the government assumes some or most of UL's debts as a precursor for someone to take over. We had the same set of conditions set out IIRC when EK took over where the government had to fund the re-fleeting of the new airbuses (hope someone in the forum can clear whether or not there were some unwanted airbuses slipped under the guise of 'discounted aircraft').

                Comment

                • banuthev
                  Administrator
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 3947

                  #7043
                  Originally posted by TheF15Ace
                  Well can't say this was a surprise. Disappointing, but with the current situation it's the most realistic solution.
                  Please note that news is mentioning the four A350s on direct orders going to be cancelled. So UL is most likely to receive three leased A350s. Hope UL will convert the four A350s to A320s instead of just cancel the order.

                  Comment

                  • dilushasg-bdavi
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 555

                    #7044
                    Originally posted by banuthev
                    Please note that news is mentioning the four A350s on direct orders going to be cancelled. So UL is most likely to receive three leased A350s. Hope UL will convert the four A350s to A320s instead of just cancel the order.
                    With 4 A350s out of the way, Mr Ratwatte must be eyeing on the opportunity to squeeze in a Bombardier C series order. Damn shame

                    Comment

                    • TheF15Ace
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2016
                      • 113

                      #7045
                      Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi
                      With 4 A350s out of the way, Mr Ratwatte must be eyeing on the opportunity to squeeze in a Bombardier C series order. Damn shame
                      He'll try though I don't know how far he will get. From the article lordvader linked:

                      The pilots who were shell shocked by the CEO’s behaviour are also upset about a secret deal that has now come to light involving him, Chairman Ajith Dias, a soon to be recruited Chief Technical Officer Dinnaga Padmaperuma and former Air Lanka and Emirates Airline pilot, retired Capt.Suhail Hashim, who is now a domiciled businessman in Canada.
                      I assume ''the former Air Lanka and Emirates Airline pilot, retired Capt.Suhail Hashim, who is now a domiciled businessman in Canada.'' will be the middle man making a pretty penny courtesy of Sri Lankan tax payers if the Bombardier order happens.
                      Last edited by TheF15Ace; 27-04-2016, 02:22 AM.

                      Comment

                      • Cayman
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 379

                        #7046
                        Originally posted by banuthev
                        Please note that news is mentioning the four A350s on direct orders going to be cancelled. So UL is most likely to receive three leased A350s. Hope UL will convert the four A350s to A320s instead of just cancel the order.
                        I think the reason why UL is not taking up the 4 A359s is due to lack of funds, so I cannot see how changing the order to A320/A321 will help.

                        Assuming UL takes up the 3 frames currently in production, will they be sufficient to cover the LHR and NRT rotations?

                        Comment

                        • ejanson65
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2013
                          • 628

                          #7047
                          I notice nobody wants to talk about how much the cancellation of 4 A350 will cost - another fiasco for the people of Sri Lanka.



                          Well with Clowns like this at the top it's a lost cause imho.

                          I have personally provided the Weliamuna Commission with letters and e-mails that prove abuse of power. Others have come forward as well.
                          Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

                          Comment

                          • lordvader
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2011
                            • 366

                            #7048
                            Originally posted by Cayman
                            I think the reason why UL is not taking up the 4 A359s is due to lack of funds, so I cannot see how changing the order to A320/A321 will help.
                            It could help with mitigating the huge cancellation costs that Airbus will slap UL with if they fully cancel the order. Plus any future A320/1NEOs arriving around the early 2020s could replace existing narrowbody aircraft then. Not the ideal scenario but possibly one of the better ones at this present time.

                            Originally posted by Cayman
                            Assuming UL takes up the 3 frames currently in production, will they be sufficient to cover the LHR and NRT rotations?
                            I remember reading an article that said that UL would be taking a fourth A350 in 2017. Hasnt been confirmed before so could be a typo.

                            Also hope UL doesnt get the Bombardier C Series, would be a huge mistake IMHO. The A350s make much more sense IMHO.

                            Comment

                            • LukeSkywalker
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 188

                              #7049
                              Originally posted by Cayman
                              I think the reason why UL is not taking up the 4 A359s is due to lack of funds, so I cannot see how changing the order to A320/A321 will help.

                              Assuming UL takes up the 3 frames currently in production, will they be sufficient to cover the LHR and NRT rotations?
                              LHR and NRT have been covered by the A333s haven't they? I don't think there is a range or payload restriction by these routes being operated by the A333?

                              Comment

                              • Cayman
                                Senior Member
                                • Mar 2011
                                • 379

                                #7050
                                Originally posted by lordvader
                                It could help with mitigating the huge cancellation costs that Airbus will slap UL with if they fully cancel the order. Plus any future A320/1NEOs arriving around the early 2020s could replace existing narrowbody aircraft then. Not the ideal scenario but possibly one of the better ones at this present time.
                                Given that most of the monies owed to manufacturers are paid towards the delivery of the aircraft (unless UL has agreed to a different payment schedule) I assume that the SL government does not envisage future cash flow to be sufficient to cover these payments for A359s.

                                Therefore, I am not sure if they will have cash flow to cover a possible narrow body acquisition either. Based on the information in the media, government wants UL to scrap the deal altogether to avoid future liabilities to make it more 'attractive' (if possible at all) to a buyer.

                                While Airbus is contractually able to impose a huge penalty, they are more likely to work with UL in a spirit of partnership to resolve the situation as they have done before with many other smaller airlines in financial difficulties. It all depends on how UL will approach their negotiations.



                                Originally posted by lordvader
                                Also hope UL doesnt get the Bombardier C Series, would be a huge mistake IMHO. The A350s make much more sense IMHO.
                                Amen!

                                Comment

                                Working...