Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cayman
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 379

    #8296
    Originally posted by Speedbird
    @ Cayman...I hope you noticed the difference between Crew Expenses and Employee Cost

    I also did a quick calculation on the labor cost
    i.e. Employ. Cost + Crew Expenses/(7000*12)
    7000 # of Employ.
    12 # of Month

    it is averaging around SLR 265K per Employee per month...(There is no saving in labour cost there)

    ^^^this is one of the factors why the yield is low

    I may be wrong this is significant cost...If the oil price goes up by $10 - 15...I wonder what would happen to the bottom line...
    Yes, I agree that the crew costs as well as the average cost per employee is quite high for SL.

    What I would like to see is the break down of costs between the flight crew and the cabin crew. As mentioned earlier, there is not much that can be done to curtail the flight deck crew given their very high job portability, but cabin crew expenses must be brought down significantly.

    It is a crime to pay such huge sums for a low skilled job, when the country's financials are in such dire straits.

    Comment

    • Cayman
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 379

      #8297
      Originally posted by Sandaru
      Well, as i know when in a doul engine failure the aircraft begins to glide. A 747-200 can glide 150 km without engines. Then the RAT will be deployed automatically to supply electricity to essential instruments.

      I think that they are not planning the flight keeping alternate airports in such a distance (2000km). Flight route planning has to be done keeping the relavant distance to alternate airports in case of emergency.
      While the glide distance vary heavily on external factors as well ad the L/D ratio of the aircraft, a rough estimate is that a modern jetliner could glide up to a 100nm from typical cruise (ie FL350 or so).

      While extremely rare, in the event of a dual flame out, that is the typical distance the flight crew will have in hand to work with.

      ETOPS rating refers to the maximum duration a single engine operation is sanctioned, in the event of a single engine flame out.

      As for keeping the flight deck (EFIS) powered up I think the sequence is: Engine 1-->Engine 2---> APU---> Battery backup---> RAT

      Comment

      • Serendib
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 1807

        #8298
        MH179 en route to CMB made a turn back to KLIA due to technical problems.

        Malaysia Airlines said the aircraft, which departed from KLIA at 10.10pm on Thursday, was forced to turn back when its auxiliary power unit (APU) was unable to start.

        “The aircraft landed uneventfully at 1.50am today, (yesterday)” it said in a statement.

        The APU is a backup power unit that is required to be switched on when an aircraft crosses over water.

        http://www.theborneopost.com/2017/02...ical-problems/

        Comment

        • Speedbird
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 616

          #8299
          For secondary airport they should have invested money on the below airport and JAF rather than building an airport in wilderness

          Comment

          • CSButterflyeffect
            Junior Member
            • Feb 2017
            • 16

            #8300
            Originally posted by Cayman
            While the glide distance vary heavily on external factors as well ad the L/D ratio of the aircraft, a rough estimate is that a modern jetliner could glide up to a 100nm from typical cruise (ie FL350 or so).

            While extremely rare, in the event of a dual flame out, that is the typical distance the flight crew will have in hand to work with.

            ETOPS rating refers to the maximum duration a single engine operation is sanctioned, in the event of a single engine flame out.

            As for keeping the flight deck (EFIS) powered up I think the sequence is: Engine 1-->Engine 2---> APU---> Battery backup---> RAT

            Yup after the Gimli Glider incident almost all the routes are planned to face the worst. I think there is a specific altitude limitation to start the APU during the flight.

            Comment

            • ejanson65
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2013
              • 628

              #8301
              Originally posted by Azamh
              Hi

              In case if a air craft fail both the engines Middle of ocean how can they handle? Like next airport is after 2000 km
              The chance of a simultaneous dual engine failure are so low that they can be disregarded. The only real - world reason this would ever happen is running out of fuel.

              Depending on the certification the aircraft needs to be within a certain distance of an alternate airport at all times.

              Normally this is 1 hour flying time on 1 engine (approximately 400nm).

              If operating under ETOPS (now called LROPS) you can have this requirement increased to 2,3 or even more hours with the distance from a alternate airport increasing. Extra crew training is required and and extra fuel may be required to cover a diversion scenario. There is also additional maintenance requirements for the engines.

              Flying across the Arabian Sea (at least the N part) can be done without LROPS using Muscat/Karachi/Mumbai/Bangalore.
              Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

              Comment

              • Lasantha
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2011
                • 12

                #8302
                Unlock your content potential with Roar Media. We specialize in creating platform-specific content for global brands and agencies at scale.

                Comment

                • banuthev
                  Administrator
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 3947

                  #8303
                  Sri Lankan Airlines Summer 2017 Update
                  Valid from 4-Apr-2017 to 28-Oct-2017

                  HIGHLIGHTS

                  • SriLankan Airlines is taking delivery of two Airbus A320neo. One A330-343 is going to re-join the SriLankan fleet after completing the wet-lease with PIA;
                  • SriLankan Airlines is in the process of removing three A320family aircraft from the fleet before April 2017. 4R-MRC was taken out of the service in November 2016 and 4R-ABK was removed from the service in late December 2016 and 4R-MRF will be taken out of the service in March 2017.
                  • SriLankan Airlines is increasing Bengaluru flights from 11 weekly to Double daily from 4-Apr-2017;
                  • SriLankan Airlines is increasing Daily flights to Jakarta, Muscat and Bahrain;
                  • SriLankan have reduced the direct flights to Male' in the Maldives from 26 weekly to 21 weekly;







                  SRILANKAN AIRLINES

                  [Valid from 4-Apr-2017 to 28-Oct-2017]

                  AIRCRAFT FLEET

                  TYPE - QTY - REGISTRATIONS
                  • A320N= 2 = ANA, ANB
                  • A320 = 6 = ABL, ABM, ABN, ABO, ABP, MRE
                  • A321 = 3 = ABQ, ABR, MRD
                  • A332 = 6 = ALA, ALB, ALC, ALD, ALH, ALJ,
                  • A333 = 7 = ALL, ALM, ALN, ALO, ALP, ALQ, ALR
                  • MD82 = 1 - EXM (Owner Fitsair Cargo )


                  DESTINATIONS


                  Far East & Orient
                  • Bangkok - 14 weekly
                  • Beijing – 4 weekly
                  • Guangzhou – 4 weekly via BKK
                  • Hong Kong – 3 weekly via BKK
                  • Jakarta – 7 weekly
                  • Kunming – 3 weekly
                  • Kuala Lumpur – 14 weekly
                  • Shanghai – 4 weekly
                  • Singapore – 21 weekly
                  • Tokyo – 4 weekly

                  Gulf and Middle East
                  • Abu Dhabi – 7 weekly
                  • Bahrain - 7 weekly
                  • Dammam – 4 weekly
                  • Doha – 7 weekly
                  • Dubai – 7 weekly
                  • Jeddah – 6 weekly
                  • Kuwait – 7 weekly
                  • Muscat – 7 weekly
                  • Riyadh – 7 weekly



                  Indian Subcontinent and Africa
                  • Bengaluru – 14 weekly
                  • Chennai – 35 weekly
                  • Delhi – 7 weekly
                  • Dhaka – 7 weekly
                  • Gan Island – 4 weekly
                  • Karachi – 7 weekly
                  • Kochi – 14 weekly
                  • Kolkota – 3 weekly
                  • Lahore – 3 weekly
                  • Madurai – 7 weekly
                  • Male' – 21 weekly
                  • Mumbai – 7 weekly
                  • Seychelles – 4 weekly
                  • Trichy – 14 weekly
                  • Trivandrum – 7 weekly


                  Europe
                  • London Heathrow – 7 weekly

                  Freighter Destinations from Colombo
                  • Bengaluru - 3 weekly
                  • Dhaka - 2 weekly
                  • Lahore - 2 weekly
                  • Mumbai - 1 weekly


                  * Colombo - Lahore - Dhaka - Colombo route



                   


                   


                   


                  © SriLankan Airlines
                  data : 19/02/2016

                  Comment

                  • Srilankan1
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 499

                    #8304
                    Good read.

                    Comment

                    • ejanson65
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 628

                      #8305
                      This shows that none of the issues are being tackled by the UL Management. The reduction in the losses basically comes from a lower fuel price.

                      'Big Talk' Ajith Dias is very quiet these days.

                      I know it's possible to 'hedge' the U$ exchange rate - just don't know if it can be done with the Rupee. Given the state of the country this is going to be an ongoing issue.

                      It's also unclear what has happened with all the accumulated losses at Mihin Lanka - my guess is they've just rolled them into the losses at UL. Next year's financials will probably be even worse as a result.

                      It's a complete disaster for the people of Sri Lanka - the sooner this is closed down the better imho.
                      Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

                      Comment

                      • Speedbird
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2012
                        • 616

                        #8306
                        http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Go...es-124158.html

                        Sri Lanka will not be going for a second round of bidding to seek a partner for the state-run SriLankan Airlines, as priority will be given to market the airline directly to global airlines, State Enterprise Development Deputy Minister Eran Wickramaratne said. Wickramaratne’s superior, State Enterprise Development Minister Kabir Hashim, in mid-January said if a candidate from the first round of bidding could not be shortlisted within a fortnight, the Prime Minister had instructed a three-member ministerial committee to call for fresh bids. “That’s a misunderstanding. We’re going for discussions with others. There’s no point of going again for bidding because the parties have seen this and they haven’t put their proposals, so we’re going for discussions,” Wickramaratne told Mirror Business. He said that the US-based investment giant, Texas Pacific Group (TPG), is now the only shortlisted candidate from the first round of bidding and refuted the allegations that the controversial primary dealer, Perpetual Treasuries, has formed a consortium with the US-based TPG to takeover SriLankan. Last month, Hashim said there were three shortlisted candidates including TPG, a consortium led by a Maldivian party and PeaceAir, a company owned by a Sri Lankan. Wickramaratne noted that TPG has no airline management experience and therefore, the discussions are ongoing between the state and TPG on what steps to take to bridge the gap. “They have to contract it or we’ll have to contract it from somewhere—technical assistance. As opposed to that, if you get an airline, the airline will have those things, but they will not have the money to invest. So, when we’re looking at a solution sometimes we need more than one party,” he said. However, he said that both TPG and the government may not have the same plans with regard to SriLankan. “We don’t even know if we will have a deal ultimately, depending on their conditions and our conditions,” he said. Wickramaratne said that the government is directly marketing SriLankan to global airlines now, since the tender process had not brought the most optimal result for the country. He noted that discussions are currently ongoing with some airlines but they are at initial stages. “Ultimately it depends on what’s on offer, what the terms are. We’re in the process of discussion. We can’t know the best deal until we know everything that’s really available. This process is very long,” he said. SriLankan has become a massive burden on the island nation’s economy with mounting debts as a result of mismanagement and politicization by successive governments.
                        here is my 2 cents ^^^ GOSL "you" are not a position in authority to set condition on foreign investment for UL...as said in these column no investor is ready to take over your airline with the bloated head counts, ridiculous debts and with militant unions and become a minority shareholder...simply to put you can sleep with your ASAs there is no value...investors are not in a charity business they are responsible for their shareholders unlike GOSL



                        229630.html

                        ^^^ and you fellows @ APGL make sure you do your strike...then at least painfully and very rapidly company could be closed down

                        Comment

                        • ejanson65
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2013
                          • 628

                          #8307
                          Originally posted by Speedbird
                          http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Go...es-124158.html



                          here is my 2 cents ^^^ GOSL "you" are not a position in authority to set condition on foreign investment for UL...as said in these column no investor is ready to take over your airline with the bloated head counts, ridiculous debts and with militant unions and become a minority shareholder...simply to put you can sleep with your ASAs there is no value...investors are not in a charity business they are responsible for their shareholders unlike GOSL



                          229630.html

                          ^^^ and you fellows @ APGL make sure you do your strike...then at least painfully and very rapidly company could be closed down
                          Agree completely - they can't even give the Airline away!

                          No Airline on the planet will touch this - this approach has already been tried.

                          Epic Fail!



                          More talk imho.
                          Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

                          Comment

                          • banuthev
                            Administrator
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 3947

                            #8308
                            Originally posted by Sandaru
                            Meanwhile the 1st a320Neo performed the Second Flight (Nearly 50 Minutes) on 14th February.
                            Ref - 4R-ANA : Third and final acceptance flight has been completed today morning. Next is delivery.

                            Haleef - do you know when does the 4R-ALN is coming back to Colombo? Will it have blue under belly sticker and SriLankan livery?

                            Comment

                            • Haleef
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2012
                              • 1468

                              #8309
                              Originally posted by banuthev
                              Ref - 4R-ANA : Third and final acceptance flight has been completed today morning. Next is delivery.

                              Haleef - do you know when does the 4R-ALN is coming back to Colombo? Will it have blue under belly sticker and SriLankan livery?
                              ALN will come within maybe the next week I guess. No confirmed date. Yes, it will be in the same way as it was before.
                              Haleef Ismail
                              www.youtube.com/haleef1 | www.instagram.com/cmb_spotter

                              Comment

                              • quickingleyero
                                Junior Member
                                • Dec 2016
                                • 21

                                #8310
                                http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Go...es-124158.html

                                Does anyone know the kind of offer that TPG made? I mean - is there any info about the amount of equity in UL that TPG asked for, and if UL Catering and Cargo are part of the equation? Also - is TPG interested in owning any stake(s) in one or both of the international airports? (I'm wondering about the airports because TPG was bidding for a stake in Mumbai airport, just a few months ago).
                                Last edited by quickingleyero; 21-02-2017, 04:09 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...