Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ejanson65
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 628

    #9886
    Originally posted by Serendib
    SriLankan Airlines turnaround in 3 years

    The new board of directors at national carrier SriLankan Airlines has assured that plans are underway to turnaround the organization in three years.
    The airline's new Chairman Ranjith Fernando told reporters on Thursday that according to the Consultant Nyras they were assured of bringing profits to the carrier. He made this announcement at the media briefing held at the airline's office in Colombo this afternoon.

    The carrier is currently faced with losses amounting to US $100 million for the FY ending March 31, he said noting that they were in a crisis. (SD)

    Sunday Times



    The Ministry of Finance and Mass Media stated that the new board of directors for SriLankan Airlines was appointed to proceed with entering into a Public Private Partnership with a strategic investor.

    The Ministry said in a statement that the restructuring of the airline, and the PPP process will continue to be guided by the Official Committee, which will be chaired by the Secretary to the Treasury.

    The statement reflects that the official committee will consult the Ministerial committee for direction as required when implementing directives given by the board of SriLankan Airlines.

    Aviation consultants, Nyras of UK will continue to report to the Official Committee, adding the working agreement is to ensure that the treasuries interests are adequately addressed in the restructuring process.

    The statement further states, the final restructuring plan prepared by Nyras with the assistance of the National Agency for PPP will be submitted for Cabinet Approval upon being endorsed by the new Board of Directors.

    According to the Nyras Plan, SriLankan Airlines can be become viable in the short to medium term through the restructuring strategy.

    The Ministry says the plan is similar to the strategy adopted by Swiss Air and Aer Lingus, both advised by Nyras, which resulted in loss-making airlines turning into profitable companies.

    https://www.newsfirst.lk/2018/04/sri...seek-investor/
    Is there anyone that still believes this nonsense?
    Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

    Comment

    • banuthev
      Administrator
      • Dec 2010
      • 3947

      #9887
      Originally posted by ejanson65
      Is there anyone that still believes this nonsense?
      As per the new directors the remaining four A359 order will be cancelled and UL aimed to become profitable in 3 years. Anyhow the profit is impossible when UL is paying more money for aircraft leasing and management salaries.

      Comment

      • ejanson65
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 628

        #9888
        Originally posted by banuthev
        As per the new directors the remaining four A359 order will be cancelled and UL aimed to become profitable in 3 years. Anyhow the profit is impossible when UL is paying more money for aircraft leasing and management salaries.
        New directors openly admit they have no Aviation experience - and then talk a bunch of 'Big Talk'.

        No mention of any investigations. Perhaps some journalists should ask them about that.


        Seems to me they've already tried to cancel this order previously - and failed.
        Same with the expensive leases.

        Most likely explanation is the A350 order is another contract with no termination clause. Why isn't this being investigated? And who pocketed the Commissions on this order ($50 million +).?

        With 3 'white tail' A350s still sitting in Toulouse from the previous order fiasco - the only thing they're going to get from airbus is 'the finger' imho.
        Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

        Comment

        • Speedbird
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 616

          #9889
          Serious safety lapses in SriLankan’s Maintenance Dept

          When EK was managing UL it was an "airline" with EASA certification and proper ETOPS...now it is a typical GOSL department and running like CTB

          Comment

          • leyland
            Member
            • Sep 2017
            • 72

            #9890
            Originally posted by Speedbird
            When EK was managing UL it was an "airline" with EASA certification and proper ETOPS...now it is a typical GOSL department and running like CTB

            http://www.sundaytimes.lk/180408/new...es-289298.html
            The cat is out of the bag then why the NEO fleet lost ETOPS

            Comment

            • lordvader
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2011
              • 366

              #9891
              Originally posted by ejanson65
              New directors openly admit they have no Aviation experience - and then talk a bunch of 'Big Talk'.
              Generally everyone on a supervisory board doesn't need industry specific (e.g. aviation) experience, but they need to be competent and able to make quick and sound decisions. E.g. replacing top management if they don't perform and actually holding them accountable for their KPIs/targets. Not holding my breath that this will happen though lol.

              Comment

              • Serendib
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2011
                • 1807

                #9892
                Originally posted by lordvader
                Generally everyone on a supervisory board doesn't need industry specific (e.g. aviation) experience, but they need to be competent and able to make quick and sound decisions. E.g. replacing top management if they don't perform and actually holding them accountable for their KPIs/targets. Not holding my breath that this will happen though lol.
                all these bastards are so corrupted...insane..freaking looters...the airline has already gone to the dogs.



                Comment

                • LukeSkywalker
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 188

                  #9893
                  Originally posted by Serendib
                  all these bastards are so corrupted...insane..freaking looters...the airline has already gone to the dogs.



                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94LV...ature=youtu.be
                  The '3 year turn around' is a very attractive catchphrase to incoming UL management. The last lot promised a 3 year turn around 3 years ago and UL is in a worser mess now. Do they seriously think people will forget or there will be an even worser financial misappropriation in 3 years time elsewhere so no one is going to be bothered in what happens in UL?

                  Comment

                  • Speedbird
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2012
                    • 616

                    #9894
                    Originally posted by lordvader
                    Generally everyone on a supervisory board doesn't need industry specific (e.g. aviation) experience, but they need to be competent and able to make quick and sound decisions. E.g. replacing top management if they don't perform and actually holding them accountable for their KPIs/targets. Not holding my breath that this will happen though lol.
                    Unfortunately in Sri Lanka labour laws are so convoluted...you cannot fire anyone...so management won't changed or fired or held responsible for KPI...they are even unable to fire Gota appointed security guy and deadwood Manoj...so what is basically happening is this clown show (I think this take 3 or 4) and year 3 they will go back to treasury for an another hand out...in return treasury will go back to IMF for an another handout...IMF will conditions for the loan and all so called educated crazies in Sri Lanka will shout against IMF...cycle continues

                    Comment

                    • domplypom
                      Junior Member
                      • Nov 2017
                      • 10

                      #9895
                      Looking at the board composition, I think they have come to the realisation the importance of debt rationalisation in the airline above everything else. No matter what operational efficiencies you gain, if cost of debt servicing is going to be more than operational profits, you still have an un viable airline. Hence they have put together a team of bankers in the hope they may be able to re-organise the balance sheet before they can have another pitch at seeking a suitable fool to take over this entity. Whether or not they are going to be able to do this, what amazes me the most is why wasn't this attempted before they went looking for a partner and embarrassed themselves?. Even this board with all their financial accolades don't seem to have any insight into this airline. I cannot believe the rhetoric is still " this is a national asset , end of Sri lankan airlines is the end of tourism industry in Sri Lanka".They, just like all the others before them are going to "stick" to their brief and waste time and more money on a fruitless task of trying to flog a dead horse. The cowardly government in the mean time are going to fund their non-sense through the public purse to further their political survival not wanting to be accused of grounding this airline. The hapless uninformed public ?..well good luck to them. They are still waiting for the messiah to come and rescue them from ever rising inflation. Not going to happen!
                      Last edited by domplypom; 10-04-2018, 12:22 AM.

                      Comment

                      • banuthev
                        Administrator
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 3947

                        #9896
                        Originally posted by domplypom
                        Looking at the board composition, I think they have come to the realisation the importance of debt rationalisation in the airline above everything else. No matter what operational efficiencies you gain, if cost of debt servicing is going to be more than operational profits, you still have an un viable airline. Hence they have put together a team of bankers in the hope they may be able to re-organise the balance sheet before they can have another pitch at seeking a suitable fool to take over this entity. Whether or not they are going to be able to do this, what amazes me the most is why wasn't this attempted before they went looking for a partner and embarrassed themselves?. Even this board with all their financial accolades don't seem to have any insight into this airline. I cannot believe the rhetoric is still " this is a national asset , end of Sri lankan airlines is the end of tourism industry in Sri Lanka".They, just like all the others before them are going to "stick" to their brief and waste time and more money on a fruitless task of trying to flog a dead horse. The cowardly government in the mean time are going to fund their non-sense through the public purse to further their political survival not wanting to be accused of grounding this airline. The hapless uninformed public ?..well good luck to them. They are still waiting for the messiah to come and rescue them from ever rising inflation. Not going to happen!
                        Hopefully Gov will select someone for CEO & COO with the strong aviation management skills. Any possibility These directors could remove excess staff and renegotiate the aircraft leases

                        Comment

                        • domplypom
                          Junior Member
                          • Nov 2017
                          • 10

                          #9897
                          Originally posted by banuthev
                          Hopefully Gov will select someone for CEO & COO with the strong aviation management skills. Any possibility These directors could remove excess staff and renegotiate the aircraft leases
                          The board will have to appoint someone with strong business turnaround skills, preferably with an aviation background to have any decent chance at this. But those people are a few and not cheap may not even want to work with this airline. Instead they are going to play with that report from Nyras and find out it is un workable in a country like SL. As for the leases ...? well since the airline has no other assets to mitigate or re organise it with , the only option is to threaten the lessors with liquidation. But this may not work either as god knows what security they have and even if they don`t they may in turn threaten to sue the owner which is a deep pocketed government. Had this airline been allowed to fail most of these issues would have sorted themselves out and if there was any residual value left that would have also been captured by a new entity and/or owners and built back up again. That`s how the real world works.

                          Comment

                          • ejanson65
                            Senior Member
                            • Jul 2013
                            • 628

                            #9898
                            There is no way out of this mess.

                            Changing a few people at the top makes no difference.

                            Layoffs will not make any difference (not that I expect this to happen).

                            Even the most basic investigation - see who signed these lease contracts on behalf of SriLankan - hasn't taken place to the best of my knowledge.


                            There is a deadline of 'April' to sort this out or shut it down - the IMF has made this very clear to the GOSL. The GOSL is not allowed to put anymore money into SriLankan.

                            Shut down is inevitable - it will happen the next time the GOSL needs another bailout from the IMF.
                            Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

                            Comment

                            • banuthev
                              Administrator
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 3947

                              #9899
                              Originally posted by banuthev
                              4R-ABP has been ferried to AUH as UL1205, today. I thought its been ferried for one of the end-of-lease-checks which have to be carried out by third-party aircraft maintenance provider. Please confirm.
                              4R-ABP has done the test flight as UL8 at AUH yesterday. It must have been completed most of the end of lease checks.

                              Comment

                              • Serendib
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2011
                                • 1807

                                #9900
                                Thomas Cook Airlines UK in October 2018 and January 2019 plans to operate charter service to Sri Lanka, with 1 flight each from London Gatwick and Manchester planned, on board Airbus A330-200 aircraft.

                                London Gatwick – Colombo
                                MT3748 LGW2020 – 1125+1CMB 332 17OCT18
                                MT3748 LGW2125 – 1315+1CMB 332 10JAN19

                                MT3749 CMB1425 – 2125LGW 332 18OCT18
                                MT3749 CMB0115 – 0740LGW 332 11JAN19

                                Manchester – Colombo
                                MT3702 MAN2045 – 1205+1CMB 332 17OCT18
                                MT3702 MAN2210 – 1415+1CMB 332 09JAN19

                                MT3703 CMB1505 – 2220MAN 332 18OCT18
                                MT3703 CMB1715 – 2355MAN 332 10JAN19

                                Source:Routes on line

                                Comment

                                Working...