Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • banuthev
    Administrator
    • Dec 2010
    • 3945

    #6556
    Originally posted by Godofpower
    IDB Development Corp. (TASE: IDBD) unit Israir Airlines and Tourism Ltd. has applied to the Israeli Ministry of Transport's Civil Aviation Authority to operate direct charter flights between Israel and Sri Lanka, sources inform "Globes.
    Do you think Israel have sufficient passenger demand for Sri Lanka flights? The news says Israir could deploy A320 for the Colombo route. But I'm wondering where the aircraft will do a technical stop between Telaviv and Colombo. As far as i know Israel aircraft not allowed in Gulf Islamic states and the Maldives.

    Comment

    • Sandaru
      Administrator
      • Oct 2015
      • 361

      #6557
      Originally posted by Srilankan1
      Thanks Sandaru. ALQ and ALR will arrive in beginning of 2016 I beleive?
      4R-ALQ conducted another test flight today.

      Comment

      • Godofpower
        Member
        • Feb 2015
        • 50

        #6558
        Originally posted by banuthev
        Do you think Israel have sufficient passenger demand for Sri Lanka flights? The news says Israir could deploy A320 for the Colombo route. But I'm wondering where the aircraft will do a technical stop between Telaviv and Colombo. As far as i know Israel aircraft not allowed in Gulf Islamic states and the Maldives.
        I don' know much about tourism but they seem to be on the rise in fact its one of the fastest growing sources of tourists to SL


        Although the highest number of tourist arrivals in September 2015 was recorded from India, China and Germany, the highest year-on-year growth rates were observed in arrivals from Israel (185.1 per cent), Kuwait (91.4 per cent) and UAE (73.3 per cent), among others. This reflects the existence of untapped potential in many countries which have not been traditional sources of tourist arrivals in the past.





        But finding a place to stop would be a issue

        Comment

        • 4R-ALA
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2013
          • 383

          #6559
          todays ul314 to kul went on time, return ul315 is delayed by 6 hrs]
          equipment is 4r-abr a321
          as per flightradar24 is diverted to kul after take off

          any idea why??

          Comment

          • banuthev
            Administrator
            • Dec 2010
            • 3945

            #6560
            Originally posted by lordvader
            Totally agree with you. A few A330-800s might be also good for UL to replace the A332s.

            I think UL could negotiate its way out of the 4 A350s ordered due for delivery around 2020. However the 3 A350s on lease are due for delivery next year so isn't it too late for UL to wiggle its way out of that commitment without incurring significant financial penalties?
            UL's first A350 has received the test registration. It looks like assembly for this aircraft will be starting in next month. There are chances UL will take delivery of 3 x A350-941s on lease from ILFC and change the 4 x A350-941 direct orders with narrow body aircraft.

            48 PR-XTE A350-941 LATAM Airlines Undergoing fuselage join JJ #5 Station 50 F-WZGU
            49 B-18401 A350-941 China Airlines Parts Arriving CI #1 Station 59 07/2016 F-WZGV
            50 HS- A350-941 Thai Airways To be assembled in Toulouse TG #2 F-WZGW
            51 OH-LWG A350-941 Finnair To be assembled in Toulouse AY #7 F-WZGX
            52 4R- A350-941 SriLankan Airlines To be assembled in Toulouse UL #1 F-WZFA

            Comment

            • lordvader
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2011
              • 366

              #6561
              Originally posted by banuthev
              UL's first A350 has received the test registration. It looks like assembly for this aircraft will be starting in next month. There are chances UL will take delivery of 3 x A350-941s on lease from ILFC and change the 4 x A350-941 direct orders with narrow body aircraft.

              48 PR-XTE A350-941 LATAM Airlines Undergoing fuselage join JJ #5 Station 50 F-WZGU
              49 B-18401 A350-941 China Airlines Parts Arriving CI #1 Station 59 07/2016 F-WZGV
              50 HS- A350-941 Thai Airways To be assembled in Toulouse TG #2 F-WZGW
              51 OH-LWG A350-941 Finnair To be assembled in Toulouse AY #7 F-WZGX
              52 4R- A350-941 SriLankan Airlines To be assembled in Toulouse UL #1 F-WZFA
              I suspect thats what will happen. Airbus might be willing to swap the direct order over if UL orders more than 4 narrowbodies or A330NEOs when/if such a swap occurs.

              Comment

              • Cayman
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 379

                #6562
                Originally posted by banuthev
                UL's first A350 has received the test registration. It looks like assembly for this aircraft will be starting in next month. There are chances UL will take delivery of 3 x A350-941s on lease from ILFC and change the 4 x A350-941 direct orders with narrow body aircraft.
                Not really a bad idea if UL can swing this. A359 will be ideal for the LHR rotation and the occasional NRT flight and three frames should suffice even if the LHR frequency is marginally increased.

                It will also give them 20 or so more seats over the A333, so overall it is a good match.

                Comment

                • banuthev
                  Administrator
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 3945

                  #6563
                  Originally posted by Srilankan1
                  Thanks Sandaru. ALQ and ALR will arrive in beginning of 2016 I beleive?
                  Today, 4R-ALQ (F-WWKV) and 4R-ALR (F-WWYF) are performing the acceptance flight in TLS. Does anybody have two of these A333s in one pic ? It's appear to be delivery of these A333 by end of this month. Hi umedhah, is it true you have visited TLS to spot these UL A333s?

                  The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

                  The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

                  Comment

                  • dilushasg-bdavi
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 555

                    #6564
                    Originally posted by lordvader
                    I suspect thats what will happen. Airbus might be willing to swap the direct order over if UL orders more than 4 narrowbodies or A330NEOs when/if such a swap occurs.
                    UL should be looking at a minimum of 10 A321/A321Neos as replacement for the 4 A359s if they are going to expand in India and South East Asia

                    Comment

                    • banuthev
                      Administrator
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 3945

                      #6565
                      Originally posted by Cayman
                      Not really a bad idea if UL can swing this. A359 will be ideal for the LHR rotation and the occasional NRT flight and three frames should suffice even if the LHR frequency is marginally increased.

                      It will also give them 20 or so more seats over the A333, so overall it is a good match.
                      UL will be receiving only three A350-941s on lease from Aercap (ilfc) in last quarter of 2016. Now Msn 52, Msn 55 and Msn 60 have been allocated for UL. These birds will be configured to carry 338 pax. We can expect UL will be flying these aircraft to London and Tokyo for the rotation purpose they will fly Doha.

                      First parts for first A350 for UL (Msn 52) will be arriving in TLS in early Jan 2016. But the delivery of the Msn 52 is not going to happen in Aug 2016 because Airbus has back log of orders to complete

                      Hi XFW-Spotter, do you have any update about SriLankan A350 Msn 52?

                      Comment

                      • digitalairliners
                        Junior Member
                        • May 2015
                        • 11

                        #6566
                        Originally posted by banuthev
                        UL will be receiving only three A350-941s on lease from Aercap (ilfc) in last quarter of 2016. Now Msn 52, Msn 55 and Msn 60 have been allocated for UL. These birds will be configured to carry 338 pax. We can expect UL will be flying these aircraft to London and Tokyo for the rotation purpose they will fly Doha.

                        First parts for first A350 for UL (Msn 52) will be arriving in TLS in early Jan 2016. But the delivery of the Msn 52 is not going to happen in Aug 2016 because Airbus has back log of orders to complete

                        Hi XFW-Spotter,, Do you have any update about SriLankan A350 Msn 52?
                        Interesting information about the A350s banuthev.

                        I have no pictures of the 2 A330s together.

                        Comment

                        • Max
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2011
                          • 919

                          #6567
                          Originally posted by banuthev
                          UL's first A350 has received the test registration. It looks like assembly for this aircraft will be starting in next month. There are chances UL will take delivery of 3 x A350-941s on lease from ILFC and change the 4 x A350-941 direct orders with narrow body aircraft.

                          48 PR-XTE A350-941 LATAM Airlines Undergoing fuselage join JJ #5 Station 50 F-WZGU
                          49 B-18401 A350-941 China Airlines Parts Arriving CI #1 Station 59 07/2016 F-WZGV
                          50 HS- A350-941 Thai Airways To be assembled in Toulouse TG #2 F-WZGW
                          51 OH-LWG A350-941 Finnair To be assembled in Toulouse AY #7 F-WZGX
                          52 4R- A350-941 SriLankan Airlines To be assembled in Toulouse UL #1 F-WZFA

                          Penalty - In Focus

                          Skymark Airlines vs Airbus

                          Airbus terminated the order for six A380s -- worth $2.5 billion at list prices -- in July. The aircraft maker said its decision to cancel the orders stemmed from “the airline’s expressed intentions for the aircraft.”

                          Skymark has said the 26.5 billion yen ($244 million) it paid to Airbus for the double-decker planes, more than the airline’s market value, may not be returned. The carrier could face demands for as much as 70 billion yen in penalties.

                          http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...ty-with-airbus

                          Comment

                          • umedhah
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 600

                            #6568
                            Originally posted by banuthev
                            Today, 4R-ALQ (F-WWKV) and 4R-ALR (F-WWYF) are performing the acceptance flight in TLS. Does anybody have two of these A333s in one pic ? It's appear to be delivery of these A333 by end of this month. Hi umedhah, is it true you have visited TLS to spot these UL A333s?

                            The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

                            http://www.flightradar24.com/data/airplanes/f-wwyf
                            Hi Banu, I am not that lucky. I just added a photo of UL 333 in TLS FB took as I was there.
                            ​Umedha Hettigoda ®

                            https://banners-my.flightradar24.com/umedhah.png

                            Comment

                            • banuthev
                              Administrator
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 3945

                              #6569
                              Singapore Airlines to increase Colombo flights from daily to 10 weekly, effec 30-Mar-2016. Good to see SQ aircraft is going to be operating at CMB during the day time hours. Anychance SQ increasing these day-time flights (SQ466/467) to daily frequency?

                              SIN-CMB-SQ466-A333-08:50-10:05-WE,FR,SA (NEW FLIGHT EFFEC 30-MAR-16)
                              SIN-CMB-SQ468-A333-22:40-23:55-DAILY
                              CMB-SIN-SQ467-A333-11:30-18:00-WE.FR.SA (NEW FLIGHT EFFEC 30-MAR-16)
                              CMB-SIN-SQ469-A333-01:10-07:40-DAILY

                              Comment

                              • lordvader
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2011
                                • 366

                                #6570
                                Originally posted by Max
                                Penalty - In Focus

                                Skymark Airlines vs Airbus

                                Airbus terminated the order for six A380s -- worth $2.5 billion at list prices -- in July. The aircraft maker said its decision to cancel the orders stemmed from “the airline’s expressed intentions for the aircraft.”

                                Skymark has said the 26.5 billion yen ($244 million) it paid to Airbus for the double-decker planes, more than the airline’s market value, may not be returned. The carrier could face demands for as much as 70 billion yen in penalties.

                                http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...ty-with-airbus
                                Different scenario as the A380s were already assembled (or almost assembled) when the order was cancelled. Furthermore Skymark cancelled the order. Whereas UL will probably replace the A350 order with smaller Airbus aircraft. UL may have to pay a penalty if it does this but it probably won't be as severe as the penalties imposed on Skymark. Look at the recent TAP order as an example.

                                Comment

                                Working...