Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Haleef
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 1468

    #9766
    Originally posted by leyland
    And it appears that they are taking the long route by staying close to the coast/land, so whatever issue with the engine it seems it is not fully resolved.

    https://www.flightradar24.com/ALK1423/10494693
    Came back from BKK today. No ETOPS (probably cancelled maybe) is my guess, that's the reason it tracked over land. Bad time period for ANE. :/
    Haleef Ismail
    www.youtube.com/haleef1 | www.instagram.com/cmb_spotter

    Comment

    • leyland
      Member
      • Sep 2017
      • 72

      #9767
      Originally posted by Haleef
      Came back from BKK today. No ETOPS (probably cancelled maybe) is my guess, that's the reason it tracked over land. Bad time period for ANE. :/
      I think you are correct, ANE is now airborne as UL207 to AUH and I think ETOPS is not required for most ME destinations

      Comment

      • Haleef
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2012
        • 1468

        #9768
        Originally posted by leyland
        I think you are correct, ANE is now airborne as UL207 to AUH and I think ETOPS is not required for most ME destinations
        ETOPS only required when flying for more than 60 minutes flying time away from the nearest airport suitable for emergency landing. ME and Indian destinations do not require ETOPS.
        Haleef Ismail
        www.youtube.com/haleef1 | www.instagram.com/cmb_spotter

        Comment

        • Speedbird
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 616

          #9769
          Originally posted by Haleef
          ETOPS only required when flying for more than 60 minutes flying time away from the nearest airport suitable for emergency landing. ME and Indian destinations do not require ETOPS.
          75/90min to ETOPS370 in A350XWB

          There are 737s flying with ETOPS180 to Hawaii

          Comment

          • leyland
            Member
            • Sep 2017
            • 72

            #9770
            Looks like ETOPS on all of UL's NEO fleet is affected. The most recent flights for 4R-ANB, ANC and AND were taking similar route to ANE while 4R-ANA has not done a flight over the Bay of Bengal over the past couple of days.

            UL404 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...r-anb#104b4a18
            UL885 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...r-anc#104a8a24
            UL893 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/f...ul893#1049733a

            Comment

            • Haleef
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2012
              • 1468

              #9771
              Originally posted by Speedbird
              75/90min to ETOPS370 in A350XWB

              There are 737s flying with ETOPS180 to Hawaii
              Yes, it varies from aircraft to aircraft..
              Haleef Ismail
              www.youtube.com/haleef1 | www.instagram.com/cmb_spotter

              Comment

              • Haleef
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2012
                • 1468

                #9772
                Originally posted by leyland
                Looks like ETOPS on all of UL's NEO fleet is affected. The most recent flights for 4R-ANB, ANC and AND were taking similar route to ANE while 4R-ANA has not done a flight over the Bay of Bengal over the past couple of days.

                UL404 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...r-anb#104b4a18
                UL885 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...r-anc#104a8a24
                UL893 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/f...ul893#1049733a
                Yes bro. Even today's UL404/405 flew over land to BKK. My father was operating this flight today, but it is also a disadvantage for the passengers and crew too, because the route is quite longer than usual = more time flying to and from BKK.
                Haleef Ismail
                www.youtube.com/haleef1 | www.instagram.com/cmb_spotter

                Comment

                • LankaXWB
                  Member
                  • Jan 2016
                  • 32

                  #9773
                  Originally posted by Aaqib
                  Any chances of its interiors being refitted onto ABL or MRE? #WishfulThinking
                  I flown MRE yesterday in UL 196. The interior is still the same as Mihin time.

                  Comment

                  • leyland
                    Member
                    • Sep 2017
                    • 72

                    #9774
                    QR is scheduled to receive their 1st A350-1000 sometime this month, any chances of seeing one of them in CMB sometime this year considering the fact that Airbus advertise it as the replacement for A346 and QR probably will start retiring their A346s with the arrival of the A35K? They have already upgraded the DOH-MLE sector to A359 from the previous A333 service.

                    Comment

                    • banuthev
                      Administrator
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 3947

                      #9775
                      Originally posted by leyland
                      QR is scheduled to receive their 1st A350-1000 sometime this month, any chances of seeing one of them in CMB sometime this year considering the fact that Airbus advertise it as the replacement for A346 and QR probably will start retiring their A346s with the arrival of the A35K? They have already upgraded the DOH-MLE sector to A359 from the previous A333 service.
                      My guess would be QR might replace the existing A346 services with B773. A350-1000 might be used for Europe, Australia, Americas and Far East. Yield on the pax traffic to CMB still lower than MLE.

                      Comment

                      • banuthev
                        Administrator
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 3947

                        #9776
                        The passenger who flew on UL flight to Gan Island said there was only around 60 passengers were onboard on the A320.

                        Comment

                        • Haleef
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2012
                          • 1468

                          #9777
                          Originally posted by banuthev
                          The passenger who flew on UL flight to Gan Island said there was only around 60 passengers were onboard on the A320.
                          It's almost the same like on UL828/829 to and from Kunming. That's the reason they are stopping it soon this month.
                          Haleef Ismail
                          www.youtube.com/haleef1 | www.instagram.com/cmb_spotter

                          Comment

                          • Aaqib
                            Senior Member
                            • Apr 2013
                            • 474

                            #9778
                            A friend flew on AI to MAA last evening on their Airbus A321.

                            Their overall service, quite particularly their food was outstanding even though they serve Veg. The crew was very good too and with the aircraft too being well maintained, which was pretty surprising in contrast to all the other reviews (mostly negative) about AI

                            Load factor was 100% on Y Class

                            Good to see AI doing well even on its other rotations from CMB to BOM and VNS.
                            Sadly 9W pulled out from the BLR-CMB sector due to IndiGo being way too much for them to handle

                            Has anyone here flown with Air India?
                            - Aaqib Hussain
                            http://www.youtube.com/@theflyinglankan

                            Comment

                            • Sandaru
                              Administrator
                              • Oct 2015
                              • 361

                              #9779
                              Originally posted by leyland
                              Looks like ETOPS on all of UL's NEO fleet is affected. The most recent flights for 4R-ANB, ANC and AND were taking similar route to ANE while 4R-ANA has not done a flight over the Bay of Bengal over the past couple of days.

                              UL404 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...r-anb#104b4a18
                              UL885 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...r-anc#104a8a24
                              UL893 - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/f...ul893#1049733a
                              ok so, problems with CFM Leap engine??

                              PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE ISSUES CONTINUE TO PLAGUE A320NEO CUSTOMERS
                              I wonder whether it is a common issue for both manufacturers?

                              Comment

                              • leyland
                                Member
                                • Sep 2017
                                • 72

                                #9780
                                Originally posted by Sandaru
                                ok so, problems with CFM Leap engine??

                                PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE ISSUES CONTINUE TO PLAGUE A320NEO CUSTOMERS
                                I wonder whether it is a common issue for both manufacturers?
                                While both engine types are having teething problems, I don't think the issues themselves are common across the types based on the article below although and I believe PW has had the bigger chunk of problems compared to CFM LEAP.

                                ​CFM International is evaluating the Leap-1A engine fleet on Airbus A320neo aircraft for a prematurely deteriorating coating on a turbine part after identifying the problem on eight engines in service.

                                Comment

                                Working...