Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SpookyFlyer
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 187

    #3466
    Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi
    when will a second runway be built at CMB??????????????????? it handled over a 7million passengers and there were 48,416 aircraft movements (tats over 100 per day!!)
    I don't think it's necessary! We need a new passenger terminal than a Runway!

    Comment

    • umedhah
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 600

      #3467
      Originally posted by SpookyFlyer
      They are going to resume #A330 service! #Interesting
      i thought they replaced the 330 with 77W ages ago?
      ​Umedha Hettigoda ®

      https://banners-my.flightradar24.com/umedhah.png

      Comment

      • SpookyFlyer
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 187

        #3468
        Originally posted by umedhah
        i thought they replaced the 330 with 77W ages ago?
        yes! but I don't think they have enough passengers to use two daily direct 77Ws

        Comment

        • Speedbird
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 616

          #3469
          Originally posted by SpookyFlyer
          I don't think it's necessary! We need a new passenger terminal than a Runway!
          Really; so if an aircraft does a hard landing...second terminal will help? (remember IL 18D EX-005 4th Feb 2004)

          Comment

          • dramirez
            Member
            • Feb 2013
            • 30

            #3470
            Originally posted by umedhah
            i thought they replaced the 330 with 77W ages ago?
            The 330 is deployed for the additional service - EK654. Flight has good connection times with inbound Europe overnight flights.
            Emirates usually "tests the water" with additional services using 330 or 340, and if good loads increases capacity with a 77x. Also there is a big demand for the 777-300ER from other routes, more on order though.

            Comment

            • NeatStuff
              Member
              • Jul 2012
              • 59

              #3471
              Originally posted by dramirez
              The 330 is deployed for the additional service - EK654. Flight has good connection times with inbound Europe overnight flights.
              Emirates usually "tests the water" with additional services using 330 or 340, and if good loads increases capacity with a 77x. Also there is a big demand for the 777-300ER from other routes, more on order though.
              While the CMB-DXB leg timings are ideal, I will not be using this due to substandard hardproduct, especially in J compared to the 77W. The price is the same, which I find stupid. One of the main issues with EK is different hard products. Waiting for them to phase out these pesky 330/340s and also get rid of the 'deeply reclining' BS they sometimes peddle.

              Comment

              • NeatStuff
                Member
                • Jul 2012
                • 59

                #3472
                Was just reading on the runway closure at DXB happening next year, when was the last time CMB was closed? Given it only has one runway, if they have to close for resurfacing/major maintenance, where do the flights go?

                I am assuming previously it would have been Ratmalana, but now would they force everyone to use HTT? That would be a disaster!

                Comment

                • dramirez
                  Member
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 30

                  #3473
                  Originally posted by NeatStuff
                  While the CMB-DXB leg timings are ideal, I will not be using this due to substandard hardproduct, especially in J compared to the 77W. The price is the same, which I find stupid. One of the main issues with EK is different hard products. Waiting for them to phase out these pesky 330/340s and also get rid of the 'deeply reclining' BS they sometimes peddle.
                  Totally agree... And for that reason I will always prefer the 777 EK650 flight!

                  Comment

                  • dilushasg-bdavi
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 555

                    #3474
                    if there is a closure of runway 04-22 at CMB......@SpookyFlyer: the planes wont land on the second terminal, the airport would have to close for over 5 hours.........a second runway is important at any intl. airport

                    Comment

                    • mohamed_naqeeb
                      Junior Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 19

                      #3475
                      Emirates A332 near Colombo on Nov 2nd 2013, cargo fire indication

                      An Emirates Airlines Airbus A330-200, registration A6-EAR performing flight EK-655 from Colombo (Sri Lanka) to Dubai (United Arab Emirates), was climbing out of Colombo when the crew stopped the climb at FL270 due to a cargo fire indication and returned to Colombo for a safe landing on runway 22 about 30 minutes after departure. Attending emergency services found no trace of fire, heat or smoke.

                      Passengers reported that following checks the aircraft was boarded and prepared for another departure, however, the crew duty time had elapsed and the flight was postponed to the next day.

                      The aircraft departed the following morning and reached Dubai with a delay of 17 hours.​
                      Aviation Herald - News, Incidents and Accidents in Aviation

                      Comment

                      • Speedbird
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2012
                        • 616

                        #3476
                        Originally posted by NeatStuff
                        Was just reading on the runway closure at DXB happening next year, when was the last time CMB was closed? Given it only has one runway, if they have to close for resurfacing/major maintenance, where do the flights go?

                        I am assuming previously it would have been Ratmalana, but now would they force everyone to use HTT? That would be a disaster!
                        Previously it has been MAA...RML cannot handle wide bodied aircraft...runway length is around 2000 meters...HRI Apron is limited and also would not be able to handle peak traffic...like passenger throughput custom, immigration, check in and local transport.

                        Comment

                        • dilushasg-bdavi
                          Senior Member
                          • Feb 2011
                          • 555

                          #3477
                          Originally posted by Speedbird
                          Previously it has been MAA...RML cannot handle wide bodied aircraft...runway length is around 2000 meters...HRI Apron is limited and also would not be able to handle peak traffic...like passenger throughput custom, immigration, check in and local transport.
                          HRI's apron can handled a maximum of 10 wide-body aircraft at once, while CMB's current capacity is 25

                          Comment

                          • NeatStuff
                            Member
                            • Jul 2012
                            • 59

                            #3478
                            Originally posted by Speedbird
                            Previously it has been MAA...RML cannot handle wide bodied aircraft...runway length is around 2000 meters...HRI Apron is limited and also would not be able to handle peak traffic...like passenger throughput custom, immigration, check in and local transport.
                            MAA is not an option, I am not talking about closing for a few hours. I am talking about major maintenance, like resurfacing which takes weeks. How did it happen before? KIA has been here for 40 years+, surely they have resurfaced the runway at least once. Where did the planes land then?

                            If RML cannot handle widebodies, then HRI would have to be the default. F all of us who have to fly to SL then! Maybe the expressway would have made it to Hambantota by then, fingers crossed.

                            Comment

                            • banuthev
                              Administrator
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 3947

                              #3479
                              Originally posted by Speedbird
                              Previously it has been MAA...RML cannot handle wide bodied aircraft...runway length is around 2000 meters...HRI Apron is limited and also would not be able to handle peak traffic...like passenger throughput custom, immigration, check in and local transport.
                              Toyama Airport in Japan has runway with 2000m handles B777 and B767 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyama_Airport

                              Comment

                              • dilushasg-bdavi
                                Senior Member
                                • Feb 2011
                                • 555

                                #3480
                                Originally posted by Banuthev
                                Toyama Airport in Japan has runway with 2000m handles B777 and B767 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyama_Airport
                                but RML's aprons(where the aircraft park) are smaller than the ones at Toyama

                                Comment

                                Working...