Sri Lanka Aviation

**umedhah** · 05-11-2013, 08:03 PM

Originally posted by Max

SriLankan Airlines reveals new aircraft, routes & alliance

SriLankan Airlines is to take delivery of new aircraft for the first time in more than a decade from August next year.

Delivered over an 18-24 month period, 10 new aircraft will join the fleet, flying routes to Europe & Asia.

Alongside six A330-300s, the airline has ordered four of the latest generations A350-900s. The new aircraft will increase seat capacity by 10-12%.

Chairman Nishantha Wickremasinghe said he hoped to move to daily flights on routes including Frankfurt, Paris & Rome over the next 18 months.

SriLankan Airlines is also set to join the Oneworld alliance in March or April 2014.

http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articl...+alliance.html

wow.. good news

**Speedbird** · 06-11-2013, 12:42 PM

Originally posted by NeatStuff

MAA is not an option...

Previously if any thing happens to Colombo...All flights were diverted to MAA...New runway was open sometime in late 80...earlier they used the existing taxiway as the runway (so it is not 40 Years)...requirement for runway maintenance/the second runway is due for a while (at least 10 Years); but the GOSL every time avoided addressing the issue...they got their priorities wrong

But you are right MAA is not a option for runway maintenance; thats why AASL have delaying this for last 10 years

**Speedbird** · 06-11-2013, 12:48 PM

Originally posted by Banuthev

Toyama Airport in Japan has runway with 2000m handles B777 and B767 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyama_Airport

I am not sure about B777...even B777-200 requires 2440M http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B777...and definitely not for A340s

**dilushasg-bdavi** · 06-11-2013, 02:55 PM

Originally posted by Speedbird

I am not sure about B777...even B777-200 requires 2440M http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B777...and definitely not for A340s

satisfied???: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-96GcS6nEr4

**CalgaryLankan** · 06-11-2013, 04:37 PM

Guys - keep an eye on first 787 service to Colombo by LOT. So far no any info in the flightaware and they have one 787 stuck in BKK due to some technical issue. Flight number 6521 (not 6651 as reported by airlineroute.net.

News | Routes

http://airlineroute.net/2013/08/18/lo6-w13/

Routes is the home of the world’s leading aviation network development conferences and events. Plus aviation news and features, and profiles of global airlines and airports.

http://www.lot.com/ca/en/flight-status?last_name=&airlineCode=LO&flightNumber=6521&departureDate=06.11.2013

**umedhah** · 06-11-2013, 07:13 PM

wow... looking fwd to see some pics

**Speedbird** · 06-11-2013, 07:29 PM

Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi

satisfied???: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-96GcS6nEr4

Absolutely Not...This is landing; What would be the take off take off weight...MTOW is 2240meters for 777-200 and there are only 88 x 777-200 built by Boeing

404

http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/7772sec3.pdf

**CalgaryLankan** · 06-11-2013, 07:48 PM

Originally posted by CalgaryLankan

Guys - keep an eye on first 787 service to Colombo by LOT. So far no any info in the flightaware and they have one 787 stuck in BKK due to some technical issue. Flight number 6521 (not 6651 as reported by airlineroute.net.

News | Routes

http://airlineroute.net/2013/08/18/lo6-w13/

Routes is the home of the world’s leading aviation network development conferences and events. Plus aviation news and features, and profiles of global airlines and airports.

http://www.lot.com/ca/en/flight-stat...ate=06.11.2013

And here she is;

Live Flight Tracker - Real-Time Flight Tracker Map | Flightradar24

http://fr24.com/LOT6521

The world’s most popular flight tracker. Track planes in real-time on our flight tracker map and get up-to-date flight status & airport information.

Hopefully there will be a water canon salute even though it is a charter flight.

**88gee** · 06-11-2013, 11:36 PM

Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi

satisfied???: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-96GcS6nEr4

dd a little u tube search abt the Toyama airport n found even 787s are landing on a 2000m runway !!!

n hear is the take off

**dilushasg-bdavi** · 07-11-2013, 10:18 AM

@speedbird: use ur common sense if dis 777-200 landed on dis runway......of course it wud takeoff from the same 2000m runway on its return journey to tokyo.......

**Speedbird** · 07-11-2013, 12:39 PM

Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi

@speedbird: use ur common sense if dis 777-200 landed on dis runway......of course it wud takeoff from the same 2000m runway on its return journey to tokyo.......

^^^buddy yes 777-200 aircraft will take off at 2000meter but at what weight? not at MTOW...do you know what MTOW means?

& do you understand the pages 8,9, 10 and 11

404

http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/7772sec3.pdf

777-200 requires 2440 meters @ MTOW and 777-200 HGW requires 3400 meters @ MTOW

**dilushasg-bdavi** · 07-11-2013, 12:55 PM

i knw wat MTOW is : Maximum Takeoff Weight....................FYI: 95% of the flights around the world do not run at full capacity!!!!! if u put MTOW to the equation, an A340, B777, B747 would have never takenoff from CMB where the rwy is 3350m

**Speedbird** · 07-11-2013, 02:24 PM

Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi

i knw wat MTOW is : Maximum Takeoff Weight....................FYI: 95% of the flights around the world do not run at full capacity!!!!! if u put MTOW to the equation, an A340, B777, B747 would have never takenoff from CMB where the rwy is 3350m

Yes now let get back to original question of operating 777-200 to RML. Only operator who operates 777-200 to Colombo is BA. (I think BA operates -ER). So let say BA operates 777-200 to Colombo and return destination is LGW. which bit longer than a Japanese domestic route. So can RML handle 777-200 in case of CMB runway maintenance answer is NO. Because there no operators who operates 777-200 to Colombo on a short distance.

**indika7777** · 07-11-2013, 05:36 PM

Guys, but in a positive note, if you calculate daily take off landing in CMB, more than 60% are narrow body aircraft, which can easily accommodate on RML.

A320 AirArabia, Mihin, Srilankan, ThaiSmile, Qatar, Etihad, RoyalJordanian, Maldivian
B737 FlyDubai, JetAirways, OmanAir, AirIndia Express, Malaysian Airlines, ChinaEastern
A321 Mihin, AirIndia, Qatar
Q400 Spice Jet

How ever despite above capability on runaway, i am really doubtful that RML has capacity on passenger handling and related infrastructure.

**Speedbird** · 08-11-2013, 01:05 AM

Originally posted by indika7777

Guys, but in a positive note, if you calculate daily take off landing in CMB, more than 60% are narrow body aircraft, which can easily accommodate on RML.
A320 AirArabia, Mihin, Srilankan, ThaiSmile, Qatar, Etihad, RoyalJordanian, Maldivian
B737 FlyDubai, JetAirways, OmanAir, AirIndia Express, Malaysian Airlines, ChinaEastern
A321 Mihin, AirIndia, Qatar
Q400 Spice Jet

How ever despite above capability on runaway, i am really doubtful that RML has capacity on passenger handling and related infrastructure.

That is true; GOSL should have developed RML as primary LCC airport and reduce the pressure in CMB

Sri Lanka Aviation

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment