Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dilushasg-bdavi
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 555

    #2821
    If u click M - u will find Mihin Lanka..........................these are not list of orders..........these are the list of currents users of all airbus aircraft
    Last edited by dilushasg-bdavi; 26-05-2013, 01:10 PM.

    Comment

    • banuthev
      Administrator
      • Dec 2010
      • 3947

      #2822
      Originally posted by lordvader
      Im pretty sure thats just an Airbus Customer list for airlines that operate any type of Airbus aircraft. Dont think theyve confirmed the order.
      Kapila told reuters on 17-May that SriLankan Airlines doesn't have cash so they are planning for a sale and lease-back six of the Airbus A330-300s. I think SriLankan Airlines should lease only brand-new six of A330-300s to replace six of A343s. A359s can be ordered five or ten years after. I doubt SriLankan Airlines is afford to do single-order of Ten widebodies. Airbus Aircraft List Prices for 2013.

      Comment

      • banuthev
        Administrator
        • Dec 2010
        • 3947

        #2823
        According to Amadeus, SriLankan Airlines resumes direct flights to Kozhikode soon. Starting Date not yet confirmed but it seems Amadeus shows starting date as 24-MAY-2013 but Reservation not yet opened. Good to hear SriLankan Airlines once a again boosting the capacity to India. Once SriLankan Airlines was the international airline which provided highest frequency of flights to India before they cut down the flights to India due to losses. SriLankan Airlines, prospective member in Oneworld should increase the more flights to India I think. Hope we will see Coimbatore, Shamashabad, Goa etc.. in the pipeline.

        Flight Schedule

        CMB - CCJ - 11:30 - 12:50 - UL169 - A320 - MO.TU.TH.FR.SA.SU
        CMB - CCJ - 13:50 - 15:10 - UL169 - A320 - WE

        CCJ - CMB - 13:40 - 15:00 - UL170 - A320 - MO.TU.TH.FR.SA.SU
        CCJ - CMB - 16:00 - 17:20 - UL170 - A320 - WE

        Comment

        • Srilankan1
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 499

          #2824
          I heard MJ has to give back one of their A320 s due to technical issues.

          Can somebody confirm this?

          Comment

          • Azamh
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2011
            • 246

            #2825
            Originally posted by Srilankan1
            I heard MJ has to give back one of their A320 s due to technical issues.

            Can somebody confirm this?
            http://www.dailymirror.lk/news/29928...ed-at-bia.html

            Comment

            • MalaysiaMustafa
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2012
              • 104

              #2826
              Even two days before, it was cancelled due to technical reason i suppose. The current status is temporary or they have to replace with another aircraft?

              Comment

              • banuthev
                Administrator
                • Dec 2010
                • 3947

                #2827
                RJ has reduced the CMB flights from three to two weekly between 22-May-3 Jul 2013, onboard A320 instead of usual A332/A342. I think RJ's A320 which fly on Amman-Colombo will have Technical Stop in Al Ain. Anybody know why RJ cut down the flights of CMB ?

                Comment

                • banuthev
                  Administrator
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 3947

                  #2828
                  Originally posted by MalaysiaMustafa
                  Even two days before, it was cancelled due to technical reason i suppose. The current status is temporary or they have to replace with another aircraft?
                  MJ can't manage with two A321s as 4R-MRE on AOG. They definately need additional aircraft to manage their flights that operates for 3x DXB, 4x SHJ, 6x BAH, 4x IXM, 5x DAC, 7x CGK on top of that MJ launched second Indonesian destination, Medan (twise a week) on 22-May-2013. I think MJ will be using UL fleet to keep up the schedule running.

                  Originally posted by Srilankan1
                  I heard MJ has to give back one of their A320 s due to technical issues.

                  Can somebody confirm this?
                  Spoke to Aircraft Technician about 4R-MRE , he said repair has been completed last night so it will be back in service anytime.

                  Comment

                  • sfernando34
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2013
                    • 143

                    #2829
                    Originally posted by Banuthev
                    RJ has reduced the CMB flights from three to two weekly between 22-May-3 Jul 2013, onboard A320 instead of usual A332/A342. I think RJ's A320 which fly on Amman-Colombo will have Technical Stop in Al Ain. Anybody know why RJ cut down the flights of CMB ?
                    Not sure... seems as though they must have had good load factors up until now. A year or two ago they switched the aircraft on the route from an Airbus A310 to the A330s and A340s... not sure why they are suddenly cutting down. I would think that Royal Jordanian might have load factor on European tourists connecting to Sri Lanka among others, but I guess it's not as popular as it used to be. Too bad, RJ made nice eye candy on early morning flights out of BIA.

                    Comment

                    • lordvader
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 366

                      #2830
                      Originally posted by Banuthev
                      MJ can't manage with two A321s as 4R-MRE on AOG. They definately need additional aircraft to manage their flights that operates for 3x DXB, 4x SHJ, 6x BAH, 4x IXM, 5x DAC, 7x CGK on top of that MJ launched second Indonesian destination, Medan (twise a week) on 22-May-2013. I think MJ will be using UL fleet to keep up the schedule running.



                      Spoke to Aircraft Technician about 4R-MRE , he said repair has been completed last night so it will be back in service anytime.
                      Not sure why they got MRE! There were much newer A321s on the market. Maybe they leased it fairly cheap? Is Mihin ordering new aircraft as was speculated before?

                      Also heres an interesting article on the almost finalised UL Airbus deal:

                      Comment

                      • banuthev
                        Administrator
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 3947

                        #2831
                        Originally posted by lordvader
                        Also heres an interesting article on the almost finalised UL Airbus deal:
                        http://www.ft.lk/2013/05/27/srilanka...b-airbus-deal/
                        In that context a deal with European aircraft maker Airbus has been finalised to procure 10 new airplanes. In a deal worth US$ 1.3 billion, SriLankan is to buy six A330-300s for medium haul flights and four A350-900s for long-haul flights. The arrangement with Airbus will ensure SriLankan Airlines remain as a single-aircraft-brand carrier with the selection of aircraft also based on a better payload. Separately a further three A350s will be sourced from the leasing market as supplies-slots from Airbus weren’t available. The A330-300s (capable of carrying 300 passengers), will begin replacing the 18 year old fuel guzzling A340-300s between October 2014 and December 2015 whilst the 340-seater A350-900s are expected to join the SriLankan fleet between 2019 and 2023. The leased three A350-900s will come in between 2017 and 2019. Despite the staggering amount, Chandrasena said modernisation was critical for the future plans of the national carrier, as investment in product upgrading was long due.
                        Thanks lordvader for the latest update on UL's new Airbus deal! The article you posted says UL is going to use the A330-300s for medium haul flights. Does this mean those A330-300s are joining the UL fleet wouldn't have the range to do long-haul ?

                        Comment

                        • Kusal077
                          Junior Member
                          • May 2013
                          • 7

                          #2832
                          Hey guys
                          Just wanted to knw weather the A340's flown by Sri Lankan airlines is a success? Looking from an economic point of view.. I knw its passenger capacity is more compared with the A330... But i have noticed that many people say that the fuel side of the plane isnt that great.. Just wanted to knw ur opinions abt this...
                          Thanks...

                          Comment

                          • sfernando34
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2013
                            • 143

                            #2833
                            Originally posted by Kusal7
                            Hey guys
                            Just wanted to knw weather the A340's flown by Sri Lankan airlines is a success? Looking from an economic point of view.. I knw its passenger capacity is more compared with the A330... But i have noticed that many people say that the fuel side of the plane isnt that great.. Just wanted to knw ur opinions abt this...
                            Thanks...
                            I've heard similar complaints to that effect about the effectiveness of the A340 when it comes to efficiency economically. In a recent article I read about the loss which UL is currently suffering from, the author highlighted the fact that the Airbus A340 has not been helpful when it comes to profit on long routes. It cited that the introduction of the Airbus A330-300, which is far more fuel-efficient, might help Sri Lankan Airlines do better moneywise. I hope that is correct! While I do like the A340 as an aircraft, I think it is not good at all on fuel efficiency, and in today's economy airlines cannot afford that.

                            Comment

                            • Kusal077
                              Junior Member
                              • May 2013
                              • 7

                              #2834
                              Originally posted by sfernando34
                              I've heard similar complaints to that effect about the effectiveness of the A340 when it comes to efficiency economically. In a recent article I read about the loss which UL is currently suffering from, the author highlighted the fact that the Airbus A340 has not been helpful when it comes to profit on long routes. It cited that the introduction of the Airbus A330-300, which is far more fuel-efficient, might help Sri Lankan Airlines do better moneywise. I hope that is correct! While I do like the A340 as an aircraft, I think it is not good at all on fuel efficiency, and in today's economy airlines cannot afford that.
                              Yea.. And especially low fuel efficiency that Sri Lankan airline's can't afford, with Sri Lankan airlines making huge losses ..
                              Anyways it's really great to see the A340's being replaced... But why didn't Sri Lankan airlines consider B787's? Isn't that a great efficient plane?

                              Comment

                              • lordvader
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2011
                                • 366

                                #2835
                                Originally posted by Banuthev
                                Thanks lordvader for the latest update on UL's new Airbus deal! The article you posted says UL is going to use the A330-300s for medium haul flights. Does this mean those A330-300s are joining the UL fleet wouldn't have the range to do long-haul ?
                                Not sure Banu, I'd think they would be getting the new A333HGWs with extra range (so it should be able to do long haul). Although someone from UL would have to confirm the version that they will get.

                                Originally posted by Kusal7
                                Yea.. And especially low fuel efficiency that Sri Lankan airline's can't afford, with Sri Lankan airlines making huge losses ..
                                Anyways it's really great to see the A340's being replaced... But why didn't Sri Lankan airlines consider B787's? Isn't that a great efficient plane?
                                The CEO was quoted as saying that Boeing didnt offer them an interim aircraft to replace the A343s whereas Airbus offered A333s to replace the A343s.

                                Heres the article: http://www.arabnews.com/news/452824
                                Last edited by lordvader; 29-05-2013, 09:28 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...