Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheF15Ace
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2016
    • 113

    #7126
    Originally posted by Speedbird
    Thats a question for the UL Finance & Capacity planning depart. If the decision is for me I will close this airline. I don't think UL cannot even afford a biplane.
    I guess we'll wait and see.

    Comment

    • Cayman
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 379

      #7127
      Originally posted by TheF15Ace
      The DL order is speculated to be a different case, but we can assume an exception was made for a blue chip airline placing a large order at a time when the company was in trouble,
      Yes, the word in the market is that Bombardier has taken a charge of $500M against the DL and AC orders.

      It looks very much like they sold the frames at a loss to get the deal.

      Comment

      • Speedbird
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 616

        #7128
        Originally posted by Aaqib
        It is speculated that Virgin Atlantic too have a plan in investing in UL!
        This would be a good move i should say as Branson would definitely revamp the current fleet and open up more to Australia and Europe and quite possibly USA too which could encourage more tourists for sure.

        Etihad too has shown interest and EY coming on board too would be a good option since they have managed Jet Airways as well as Air Seychelles quite well.

        Anyways lets hope for the best!
        Awaiting a much needed management change soon
        Not sure about EY...Virgin would not touch this they are already selling Virgin America unless GOSL swallows complete debt...and Richard has a bigger headache to resolve...it is called Virgin Galactic

        Comment

        • TheF15Ace
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2016
          • 113

          #7129
          Originally posted by Cayman
          Yes, the word in the market is that Bombardier has taken a charge of $500M against the DL and AC orders.

          It looks very much like they sold the frames at a loss to get the deal.
          Embraer's CEO has made the same accusation, stating that the order was based on ''improper government subsidies''



          Anybodies guess whether there is any substance in his claim or he is just being a sore loser.

          The issue is these claims will keep popping up with regard to the DL and AC orders because they happened almost parallel with the C Series program being bailed out by the government.

          I do hope that Bombardier uses this recent success to secure more high profile orders. The C300 looks like a prime candidate to take over the A319 & 737-700 as the NEO/MAX versions of these two jets haven't been particularly popular. LH is expected to make a healthy order if the number look good once the C Series is in service at LX. AA and B6 have also expressed interest so the ball is in Bombardier's court.

          Comment

          • Speedbird
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2012
            • 616

            #7130

            Comment

            • Speedbird
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2012
              • 616

              #7131
              Originally posted by Cayman
              Yes, the word in the market is that Bombardier has taken a charge of $500M against the DL and AC orders.

              It looks very much like they sold the frames at a loss to get the deal.
              I am looking for an aircraft manufacture who does not have any state subsidies...

              Comment

              • ejanson65
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2013
                • 628

                #7132
                Originally posted by Aaqib
                It is speculated that Virgin Atlantic too have a plan in investing in UL!
                This would be a good move i should say as Branson would definitely revamp the current fleet and open up more to Australia and Europe and quite possibly USA too which could encourage more tourists for sure.

                Etihad too has shown interest and EY coming on board too would be a good option since they have managed Jet Airways as well as Air Seychelles quite well.

                Anyways lets hope for the best!
                Awaiting a much needed management change soon
                UL is not a business - it is Racketeering on a massive scale. If you run it like a business a lot of people will lose their cushy jobs and the Politicians, their families, friends and cronies will lose their income from all the corrupt deals.

                This is why nothing will happen.
                Just a lot of empty talk.

                As for Branson:-

                People like this are very image conscious - they will not have their brand associated with theft, fraud and corruption.

                We all know how "Business"is done in Sri Lanka - Branson will never get involved in such things.

                Why do you think Lufthansa walked away? Another image conscious company.

                Until the Racketeering is dealt with at the national level anything else is just a waste of time and will achieve nothing imho.
                Last edited by ejanson65; 15-05-2016, 04:50 AM.
                Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business

                Comment

                • Cayman
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 379

                  #7133
                  Originally posted by Speedbird
                  I am looking for an aircraft manufacture who does not have any state subsidies...
                  Tell that to the WTO!

                  So, it is OK to do something wrong because everyone else is also doing?

                  You sound Trump-ish

                  Comment

                  • Speedbird
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2012
                    • 616

                    #7134
                    Originally posted by Cayman
                    Tell that to the WTO!

                    So, it is OK to do something wrong because everyone else is also doing?

                    You sound Trump-ish
                    it is not ok...but cannot cry sour grape; for a pending CAD 1 billion (USD 750 Million)investment on stocks in Bombardier from Quebec prov govt. These investments are within the WTO guidelines.

                    Where as in Sri Lanka GOSL (Tax payer) is going to write off USD 3.2 billion in debt. Thats a huge govt subsidy. HRI subsidies by CMB. Hambantota Port subsidized by Colombo Port. Fertilizer subsidized for farmers...and on and on. These are direct subsidies.

                    You are showing your true Sri Lankaness...When cannot justify by facts then head for character assassination AKA US Republican party...mastered in Sri Lanka now adopted by Trump and his bandwagon

                    Last edited by Speedbird; 15-05-2016, 02:32 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Speedbird
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2012
                      • 616

                      #7135
                      Originally posted by ejanson65
                      UL is not a business - it is Racketeering on a massive scale. If you run it like a business a lot of people will lose their cushy jobs and the Politicians, their families, friends and cronies will lose their income from all the corrupt deals.

                      This is why nothing will happen.
                      Just a lot of empty talk.
                      To sum it up.
                      UL is a panhandler on the side of the road; who lives off the handout (GOSL Treasury); thinking how to own a BMW (A350) and also think that it belong in a prestigious golf club/clubhouse (like tries it self hard to asses itself with ME3 and other established airline)

                      Racketeering is part of Sri Lanka embedded system. Mostly it is assumed that racketeering is in the GOSL; but private sector is also second to none. Even the villager try thinking how can I rip off the other villager. Racketeering in Sri Lanka is highly prevalent.

                      Comment

                      • Cayman
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 379

                        #7136
                        Originally posted by Speedbird
                        it is not ok...but cannot cry sour grape; for a pending CAD 1 billion (USD 750 Million)investment on stocks in Bombardier from Quebec prov govt. These investments are within the WTO guidelines.
                        I do not think such payments are within the guidelines of WTO. Government investments in globally operating indigenous industries is against WTO policy, because it gives them an unfair advantage in the global arena as far as I know. This is the reason China is being dragged in front of WTO every so often, because rest of the world industry is protesting Chinese government investing their enormous wealth in entities that operate in the global stage..

                        Originally posted by Speedbird
                        Where as in Sri Lanka GOSL (Tax payer) is going to write off USD 3.2 billion in debt. Thats a huge govt subsidy. HRI subsidies by CMB. Hambantota Port subsidized by Colombo Port. Fertilizer subsidized for farmers...and on and on. These are direct subsidies.
                        This has nothing to do with C Series being subsidized allowing them to win DL order. However, I fully agree that the Sri Lankan public should not have to shoulder the sins of UL. I am very much in favor of UL being sold (I highly doubt anyone will buy it) or immediately disbanded to save the SL Tax Payer.

                        Originally posted by Speedbird
                        You are showing your true Sri Lankaness...When cannot justify by facts then head for character assassination AKA US Republican party...mastered in Sri Lanka now adopted by Trump and his bandwagon
                        You made this personal by attacking me for being Sri Lankan. I have not lived in SL for the past 20 years, so I am not sure how much of my "Sri Lankaness" remains intact, but I have absolutely no problem being identified with Sri Lanka.

                        I cannot understand why you have so much hatred towards Sri Lanka and I am offended by your statement "US Republican party...mastered in Sri Lanka now adopted by Trump and his bandwagon".

                        Is this a fact? Do you have proof that over the time the US republican party has in fact adopted a model of bigotry, xenophobia and hatred "mastered" in Sri Lanka?

                        Comment

                        • Speedbird
                          Senior Member
                          • Feb 2012
                          • 616

                          #7137
                          Originally posted by Cayman
                          I admire your patriotism and the love for "Assembled in Canada" brand...
                          Bombardier makes great trains and lousy planes. Should have stuck with what they know.
                          Originally posted by Cayman
                          You sound Trump-ish
                          Originally posted by Cayman

                          You made this personal by attacking me for being Sri Lankan. I have not lived in SL for the past 20 years, so I am not sure how much of my "Sri Lankaness" remains intact, but I have absolutely no problem being identified with Sri Lanka.

                          I cannot understand why you have so much hatred towards Sri Lanka and I am offended by your statement "US Republican party...mastered in Sri Lanka now adopted by Trump and his bandwagon".
                          This thread is taking outside the aviation thread
                          Here is my last response...So do I ?

                          Comment

                          • banuthev
                            Administrator
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 3947

                            #7138
                            Originally posted by Speedbird
                            Yup...UL has sold one & 3 are under negotiation; if the negotiation fails it is a another thing but for now 3 are up for sale ...& above post by A350 XWB sums it up

                            For narrow body aircrafts...did hear something starting with letter C
                            According to Sunday Times, UL is in the process of cancelling the lease agreements and paying penalty for the three A350s which are already in Final Assembly line in TLS, and including fourth A350 which was about lease to UL in end of 2017. It seems to be UL & Aercap has already cancelled the lease transaction for the first A350 (must be MSN52) few weeks ago. News says leases for four of these A350s were made with high rates. Looks like UL still hasn't decided yet to cancel the direct orders for four A350s due after 2019. SL gov trying to swallow some of the debt from UL to handover the full UL management to other airline.

                            Is CX not interested in managing UL?

                            Comment

                            • LukeSkywalker
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 188

                              #7139
                              Originally posted by banuthev
                              According to Sunday Times, UL is in the process of cancelling the lease agreements and paying penalty for the three A350s which are already in Final Assembly line in TLS, and including fourth A350 which was about lease to UL in end of 2017. It seems to be UL & Aercap has already cancelled the lease transaction for the first A350 (must be MSN52) few weeks ago. News says leases for four of these A350s were made with high rates. Looks like UL still hasn't decided yet to cancel the direct orders for four A350s due after 2019. SL gov trying to swallow some of the debt from UL to handover the full UL management to other airline.

                              Is CX not interested in managing UL?
                              The whole order cancellation business seems to be in utter shambles or the local SL media has been misquoting the ministers. First we heard the direct orders were cancelled and UL trying to sell of the frames but now they say the direct order is still undecided, and it is the leased ones that is cancelled now ???

                              If they are looking for partner the various confusing news releases is not helping the perception on any potential investors as the Gov insists on this being a public private partnership rather than a wholesale privatization. Who will want to do business with someone who gives different stories like this everyday and don't remember what the hell they told the previous day? There was another news article where the government now says they don't want to assume the whole debt now as opposed to the earlier absorb all debt tune.

                              If there is someone form UL in the forum can you please give as an idea on what is happening with the A350 type rating training? is it still going on? At least that would give an indicator what will really happen to the initial leased frames (despite all the apparent financial wizardry of our ministers to restructure the debt and rescue UL).

                              Comment

                              • TheF15Ace
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2016
                                • 113

                                #7140
                                Originally posted by LukeSkywalker
                                The whole order cancellation business seems to be in utter shambles or the local SL media has been misquoting the ministers. First we heard the direct orders were cancelled and UL trying to sell of the frames but now they say the direct order is still undecided, and it is the leased ones that is cancelled now ???

                                If they are looking for partner the various confusing news releases is not helping the perception on any potential investors as the Gov insists on this being a public private partnership rather than a wholesale privatization. Who will want to do business with someone who gives different stories like this everyday and don't remember what the hell they told the previous day? There was another news article where the government now says they don't want to assume the whole debt now as opposed to the earlier absorb all debt tune.

                                If there is someone form UL in the forum can you please give as an idea on what is happening with the A350 type rating training? is it still going on? At least that would give an indicator what will really happen to the initial leased frames (despite all the apparent financial wizardry of our ministers to restructure the debt and rescue UL).
                                IMHO all this confusion is as much as UL's fault as it is the minister's and media. Even though they are more than aware of the crap they are in, it seems they prefer to lay back and silently ride it through knowing the government is going to clean up their mess. UL should be forced to make a very detailed and public disclosure about their current situation and how they plan to get out of it. It's not like they can refuse, seeing how if it''s not for the public pretty soon they won't be able to even take half their salary home.

                                Not that it will happen, but I feel it should be the right thing to do
                                Last edited by TheF15Ace; 16-05-2016, 02:18 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...