Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ULlove
    replied
    Originally posted by MAW2000

    Agree, if going with Boeing, It should not be B737 Max jets, its should be B787-9s, B777 is too large and no requirement to operate such a big aircraft, UL needs to maintain separate Boeing and Airbus warehouses and Crew sets which complicating operations, so better to stick with Airbus for a while.
    Some very younger
    A320-232WLs and A320-214WLs are there and few A330-243s are there as I heard. (Recently few airlines ceased their operations and declared bankruptcy)
    UL can do something with its existing order of
    4 Jets in Airbus order book, (As I mentioned : Converting it to A321-251Ns {Better} or A330-841s) but it may take time.
    problem is the management maybe working hard/ sleeping on the wheel, but being a State owned carrier, the approvals take their sweet time and by the time its approved the aircraft would have found another home. Very Sad.

    Boeing!! lovely aircrafts.. but wrong time for transformation... probably once UL is privatised again

    Leave a comment:


  • n863gt
    replied
    Originally posted by MAW2000

    Check this Screenshot:


    thai FB channel showing HS-XTS, but in some flynas colors(no titles, of course though)
    this confirms that HS-XTS WAS MSN 1757.

    Leave a comment:


  • n863gt
    replied
    Originally posted by MAW2000

    Question is about Capital investment to get (Purchase/ Dry lease) B787s (Not Rolls Royce 1000, should be General Electric) (Spare Engines, Simulator, Toolkits and Accessories, Crew Training) and the time to get jets!
    they could try wetleasing from other carriers to observe practicality.
    something similar to what 6E does with 77Ws and 7M8s

    Leave a comment:


  • MAW2000
    replied
    Originally posted by MAW2000

    Confirmed :
    Check this Screenshot:
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • MAW2000
    replied
    Originally posted by banuthev

    Any chance SL gov wanted to get Boeing aircraft order as part of push to ease US tariffs?
    Question is about Capital investment to get (Purchase/ Dry lease) B787s (Not Rolls Royce 1000, should be General Electric) (Spare Engines, Simulator, Toolkits and Accessories, Crew Training) and the time to get jets!

    Leave a comment:


  • WizzWaveSien
    replied
    Originally posted by n863gt
    TK730 flight path this morning.
    what was the reason for the flight path in the final few minutes(which was somewhat unusual)
    weather?
    Indeed, weather around CMB getting worse due to the depression happening around the Bay of Bengal, possibly for it to expand into a cylonic storm in the coming days.

    Leave a comment:


  • n863gt
    replied
    TK730 flight path this morning.
    what was the reason for the flight path in the final few minutes(which was somewhat unusual)
    weather?
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 1 photos.

    Leave a comment:


  • banuthev
    replied
    Originally posted by n863gt
    MAW:
    "Agree, if going with Boeing, It should not be B737 Max jets, its should be B787-9s, B777 is too large and no requirement to operate such a big aircraft, UL needs to maintain separate Boeing and Airbus warehouses and Crew sets which complicating operations, so better to stick with Airbus for a while.
    Some very younger A320-232WLs and A320-214WLs are there and few A330-243s are there as I heard. (Recently few airlines ceased their operations and declared bankruptcy)
    UL can do something with its existing order of 4 Jets in Airbus order book, (As I mentioned : Converting it to A321-251Ns {Better} or A330-841s) but it may take time."

    I think there are a lot of ex-NK A320-232WLs being wfu from their fleet from a while now.
    OG has some A320-251Ns stored since its shutdown.

    I do agree that they should not rush to operate boeing jets because of the great differences between aircraft of the 2 manufacturers.
    getting brand new jets would take a long time in this period.

    apparently i am not able to quote up a post, hence the manually applied quotation.
    and after this now im able to do it again?
    Any chance SL gov wanted to get Boeing aircraft order as part of push to ease US tariffs?

    Leave a comment:


  • n863gt
    replied
    Originally posted by MAW2000

    Confirmed :
    "invalid file specified"
    in other words its not opening.

    Leave a comment:


  • n863gt
    replied
    Originally posted by Haleef

    There seems to be some confusion here. XTS was MSN 1757 and was just ferried. Not 1037. The UL deal with 1037 isn't totally off, but has run into delays.
    can confirm that indeed MSN 1757 was delivered to XJ and not 1037.(as HS-XTS)
    https://www.planespotters.net/airfra...rasia-x/r6kkgk

    ex-SAA ZS-SXK and ex-XY HZ-NE23. (9y/o airframe)

    Leave a comment:


  • banuthev
    replied
    Originally posted by Haleef

    There seems to be some confusion here. XTS was MSN 1757 and was just ferried. Not 1037. The UL deal with 1037 isn't totally off, but has run into delays.
    Thanks Haleef! Really appreciated! Do you know what causing the delays? Do you have any update when MSN 1037 will be painted in SriLankan Livery ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Haleef
    replied
    Originally posted by banuthev

    It appears to be MSN 1037 (A333) being delivered to Thai AirAsia as HS-XTS on the 23 Oct 2025.
    There seems to be some confusion here. XTS was MSN 1757 and was just ferried. Not 1037. The UL deal with 1037 isn't totally off, but has run into delays.

    Leave a comment:


  • n863gt
    replied
    MAW:
    "Agree, if going with Boeing, It should not be B737 Max jets, its should be B787-9s, B777 is too large and no requirement to operate such a big aircraft, UL needs to maintain separate Boeing and Airbus warehouses and Crew sets which complicating operations, so better to stick with Airbus for a while.
    Some very younger A320-232WLs and A320-214WLs are there and few A330-243s are there as I heard. (Recently few airlines ceased their operations and declared bankruptcy)
    UL can do something with its existing order of 4 Jets in Airbus order book, (As I mentioned : Converting it to A321-251Ns {Better} or A330-841s) but it may take time."

    I think there are a lot of ex-NK A320-232WLs being wfu from their fleet from a while now.
    OG has some A320-251Ns stored since its shutdown.

    I do agree that they should not rush to operate boeing jets because of the great differences between aircraft of the 2 manufacturers.
    getting brand new jets would take a long time in this period.

    apparently i am not able to quote up a post, hence the manually applied quotation.
    and after this now im able to do it again?

    Leave a comment:


  • banuthev
    replied
    Originally posted by channa

    4R-ALN flying back to CMB as UL 471
    I wonder why ALN is not active since it arrived from ICN on the 17-Oct?

    Leave a comment:


  • banuthev
    replied
    Originally posted by MAW2000

    Confirmed :
    Thanks, our website is only support JPG file for pictures. Type PNG only being used for icons on this website.

    Any aircraft deliveries are on pipeline for UL and 8D?

    Leave a comment:

Working...