Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LukeSkywalker
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 188

    #961
    Originally posted by Cayman
    Yes, That is why I said the "List Price".

    Car salesmen will discount both the Audi A8 and the Toyota Yaris, but the Yaris will always be cheaper than the A8.

    The same logic applies.
    No airframer is so desperate to give away planes; A T7W is still going to cost more than the 330 at the end of the day and a new type is going to have other added on costs associated with it......

    Comment

    • uthum
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 136

      #962
      Originally posted by CalgaryLankan
      Took a somewhat difficult decision to miss UL and fly Qatar from YUL to CMB via DOH. $200 less, 5-star airline as per Skytrax. 2 pcs of luggage all the way from YYC

      Plus some horror stories from recent UL customers. Still it would have been nice to fly UL. May be next time.
      What about Royal Jordanian ? My friend flew RJ from YUL to CMB a couple of months ago.they offered the cheapest fare at that time.The nicest thing of his journey was that he spent an overnight layover in Amman and he was given access to a lounge for free

      Comment

      • CalgaryLankan
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 251

        #963
        Originally posted by uthum
        What about Royal Jordanian ? My friend flew RJ from YUL to CMB a couple of months ago.they offered the cheapest fare at that time.The nicest thing of his journey was that he spent an overnight layover in Amman and he was given access to a lounge for free
        Options I got out of YYC; BA/GF, AC/UL, CO/QR or AC/QR were the best prices from YYC. This deal came from QR website as a 3 day sale, and beat all the quotes I got from 3 travel agents. I know there are other deals out of YYZ or YUL, but not from YYC. Looking forward to experience #1 airline in the world.

        Comment

        • ecureilx
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 616

          #964
          Originally posted by LukeSkywalker
          No airframer is so desperate to give away planes; A T7W is still going to cost more than the 330 at the end of the day and a new type is going to have other added on costs associated with it......
          Plus plus the logistics of the monster GE-90-115s

          Ah, well, in the cyber world, a lot of people have a lot of theories like Airbus pays Customers to buy Planes, Boeing loans planes almost FOC .. etc. etc.

          Comment

          • unique
            Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 47

            #965
            4R-ALH, Airbus A330-200, ALK_A332, EI-AOK, SriLankan Airlines (ALK), ZRH 2011-11-23

            Pic :http://easy-spotting.blogspot.com/20...rh2011-11.html

            Comment

            • umedhah
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 600

              #966
              Originally posted by unique
              4R-ALH, Airbus A330-200, ALK_A332, EI-AOK, SriLankan Airlines (ALK), ZRH 2011-11-23

              Pic :http://easy-spotting.blogspot.com/20...rh2011-11.html
              notice a difference of this a/c with others in the fleet??? Srilankan.aero has been replaced by srilankan.com. i wonder why only this a/c.. .com and .aero points to the same site
              ​Umedha Hettigoda ®

              https://banners-my.flightradar24.com/umedhah.png

              Comment

              • Max
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2011
                • 919

                #967
                Originally posted by umedhah
                notice a difference of this a/c with others in the fleet??? Srilankan.aero has been replaced by srilankan.com. i wonder why only this a/c.. .com and .aero points to the same site

                Comment

                • Kflyer
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 169

                  #968
                  Originally posted by ecureilx
                  Plus plus the logistics of the monster GE-90-115s
                  What makes you call them monster? They're the sweetest!
                  Joking apart, what really matters is the operating cost - where the 77W has the edge.
                  The opinions above are solely my own and do not reflect those of my employer or clients

                  Comment

                  • Kflyer
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 169

                    #969
                    Originally posted by umedhah
                    notice a difference of this a/c with others in the fleet??? Srilankan.aero has been replaced by srilankan.com. i wonder why only this a/c.. .com and .aero points to the same site
                    This is the new corporate URL of SriLankan. Makes sense as most people will try typing .com first.
                    The opinions above are solely my own and do not reflect those of my employer or clients

                    Comment

                    • Cayman
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 379

                      #970
                      Originally posted by Kflyer
                      What makes you call them monster? They're the sweetest!
                      Joking apart, what really matters is the operating cost - where the 77W has the edge.
                      Yes, they are the sweetest in a 'kid in the candy store' kind of way.

                      While I agree that 77W has a clear edge in operating costs the economies of scale will not apply if UL buys just a handful of frames, which is what they are looking for at the moment. In such a scenarion the acquisition cost and the platform introduction costs will easily evaporate the operations cost advantage and reduce the economic benefit and the viability of the whole exercise.

                      We all like to see the 77W in UL livery, but this is an adult's discussion on what is most appropriate for the economically and practically.
                      Last edited by Cayman; 26-11-2011, 10:42 AM.

                      Comment

                      • banuthev
                        Administrator
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 3947

                        #971
                        Thai AirAsia has dropped the plan to flying BKK-CMB. However Thai Airways is adding capacity on CMB by replacing B777-200 with B777-300.

                        On the 11th and 12th May 2012, SriLankan Airlines is operating temporary extra flights on CMB-BKK-CMB route.

                        12:00 - 17:00 - CMB-BKK - UL1422 - A340 - Fri.Sat
                        18:00 - 19:55 - BKK-CMB - UL1423 - A340 - Fri.Sat

                        Originally posted by umedhah
                        notice a difference of this a/c with others in the fleet??? Srilankan.aero has been replaced by srilankan.com. i wonder why only this a/c.. .com and .aero points to the same site
                        Now most of the UL aircraft fleet got .com sticker. See some examples : 4R-ADB - http://www.airliners.net/photo/SriLa...e5b69634f2c00a. 4R-ADE - http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7236651

                        Comment

                        • Kflyer
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2011
                          • 169

                          #972
                          Originally posted by Cayman
                          Yes, they are the sweetest in a 'kid in the candy store' kind of way.

                          While I agree that 77W has a clear edge in operating costs the economies of scale will not apply if UL buys just a handful of frames, which is what they are looking for at the moment. In such a scenarion the acquisition cost and the platform introduction costs will easily evaporate the operations cost advantage and reduce the economic benefit and the viability of the whole exercise.

                          We all like to see the 77W in UL livery, but this is an adult's discussion on what is most appropriate for the economically and practically.
                          Sorry mate, but you seem to have no idea about the way aircraft deals are structured.
                          The opinions above are solely my own and do not reflect those of my employer or clients

                          Comment

                          • SpookyFlyer
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2011
                            • 187

                            #973
                            I saw RJ A340-211 at CMB! But the website said It's A330! O.o

                            Comment

                            • Cayman
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 379

                              #974
                              Originally posted by Kflyer
                              Sorry mate, but you seem to have no idea about the way aircraft deals are structured.
                              You seem to have no idea of what I am talking about. I am not talking about how aricraft deals are structured, I am talking about the economic viability of introducing 77W in to UL fleet and the fact that they are better off with A333 instead.

                              Comment

                              • banuthev
                                Administrator
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 3947

                                #975
                                Originally posted by SpookyFlyer
                                I saw RJ A340-211 at CMB! But the website said It's A330! O.o
                                Nice to see you here ! RJ brought A330s to CMB only in Aug-Sep 2011. But they fly on A313s in summer and A342s in Winter.

                                Do you live near CMB ?

                                Comment

                                Working...