Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sri Lanka Aviation
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Hi everyone,
Good news EK will be deploying their new A359s on their EK655 to CMB soon, starting from 10th of March, after a delay of 3 months due to supply chain issues. EK will be the 2nd A350 operator at CMB after QR and SQ (SQ will join later this year).
A359.jpg
- Likes 2
-
Originally posted by banuthev View Post
I believe UL and CMB have to be developed and well managed to generate income and tourism for Sri Lanka. Since Sri Lanka is near India and the Maldives can make use of the Indian Transit travellers to transit via CMB to reach rest of the world.
UL better increase flights as below : -
*Double daily flights to LHR, SYD, MEL, NRT
*Single Daily flights to CDG, FRA, MXP, NBO, ICN, PEK, PVG, HKG, SEZ, MAU, AKL, PKT,
*Triple daily flights to Middle East and Far East.
*UL should have point to point direct flights to all over India.
UL better start domestic flights and develop domestic terminal at CMB to give quick transit for the JAF travellers from the UK, Australia, Canada. Sri Lanka also should start frequent slow trains from CMB to Galle, Kandy to encourage people to access the airport to get domestic flights.
I believe UL need 51 aircraft.
Guys, Please share your thoughts
UL should also focus on becoming the preferred airline for travel to the Maldives. Maybe a flight from North America would work if it made a stop in MLE before continuing to CMB. This would make UL unique among the competition. And they should look into reinstating the MLE stop for some of the European flights - travelers will be willing to pay a premium to fly non-stop to MLE rather than transferring in DXB or DOH.
I hope UL can increase their frequency to at least daily to SYD and NRT. (But I don't think the current Australian bilateral allows for an increase in flights?). It is a shame that LHR is going from 9 to 7/week this summer. Double daily to LHR would be ideal but getting slots will be a challenge.
Additional European destinations should be considered - ZRH and AMS? And given the diaspora, a flight to Toronto should also be evaluated. This could be an attractive option to the south Indian community in YYZ as well.
With the right management and access to capital, UL could easily double their fleet size and be profitable.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi everyone, seems like Bulgaria Air has begun SOF-SHJ-HRI services on their A319s and A320s, I think this is a new flight. I am not sure if this is a one off flight.
Can someone confirm for how long they will be in CMB for? thanksAttached Files
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by banuthev View Post
Heard test flight planned in Apr25 and delivery in May25. I requested UL for permission to see the aircraft but no reply yet. I might visit CHR if i get permission.
what is the seat-config of the A332?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by banuthev View Post
MSN 1261 is getting ready for UL in CHR. Spotter said it's been parked front of the hangar since Jan25 and no visibility to take photos for the spotters. Any idea if it will be painted in SriLankan livery?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by A359 View Post
Airbus still shows four A350-900s for UL in their order book. If UL has the resources to firm up the orders, Airbus may be able to find production slots for these four aircraft.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by banuthev View Post
4R-XWA, B, C, & D were configured with 1-2-1 Business Class and 3-3-3 Economy class. Total Business class seats 28 and Total Economy class seats 303. Sichuan Airlines are still have these ex-UL birds in UL interior and config. Rest of Sichuan Airlines A350s have their own Sichuan interiors and configs. Any possibilities UL would've negotiated with Aercap and ALC delay taking these A350s (XWA, B, C, D) from 2030?
Leave a comment:
-
4R-ALH is under maintenance.(If i'm not wrong)
what is the current status of AND?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by skyline View Post
Don't you think 51 aircraft too much for UL?
That means have to add around 30 odd aircraft. Is it possible to do with the present situation?
UL better increase flights as below : -
*Double daily flights to LHR, SYD, MEL, NRT
*Single Daily flights to CDG, FRA, MXP, NBO, ICN, PEK, PVG, HKG, SEZ, MAU, AKL, PKT,
*Triple daily flights to Middle East and Far East.
*UL should have point to point direct flights to all over India.
UL better start domestic flights and develop domestic terminal at CMB to give quick transit for the JAF travellers from the UK, Australia, Canada. Sri Lanka also should start frequent slow trains from CMB to Galle, Kandy to encourage people to access the airport to get domestic flights.
I believe UL need 51 aircraft.
Guys, Please share your thoughts
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MAW2000 View Post
Agree, but small addition,
Its better to go with some used A333s or A332s (at least 5 jets) and extending the lease period of existing A333s until 2029, 2030 for now and then negotiate with Airbus for fleet renewal, Purchasing and selling back to Lessors and leasing back for 12 years is a good option.
Better option is to go with A359s (at least 8-10 jets, with 1-2-1 business class with premium economy with 3-3-3 economy or only 2-4-2 economy like ANA 787s), which will make UL strong and access new destinations such as AKL, New Zealand, and USA (with the aim of targeting Indian market).
Best option for the current financial condition is going with A339s (8-10 jets) which is easy to induct, lower capital cost for maintenance, crew training. But better to not to go with A338s because of of thin Profit margin per flight, Less Pax, more range, same applies for B788, (Need to carry the entire aircraft gross weight with less pax, for a longer range which needs much fuel and ticket prices will be higher than competitors, if the ticket pricing is same as SG, MH, profit margin will be thin.)
Thanks
You do not have permission to view this gallery.
This gallery has 2 photos.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SHOCKWAVE View Post4r alt - 1060, alu - 1037 & alv - 1261 (tbn)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by n863gt View Post
getting either an A339 or a A359 isnt going to be easy though. both have somewhat big backlogs.
UL could lease[short term] some to(at least) get an experience on the operations of those 2 aircraft.
correct me if I'm wrong though,
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MAW2000 View Post
Agree, but small addition,
Its better to go with some used A333s or A332s (at least 5 jets) and extending the lease period of existing A333s until 2029, 2030 for now and then negotiate with Airbus for fleet renewal, Purchasing and selling back to Lessors and leasing back for 12 years is a good option.
Better option is to go with A359s (at least 8-10 jets, with 1-2-1 business class with premium economy with 3-3-3 economy or only 2-4-2 economy like ANA 787s), which will make UL strong and access new destinations such as AKL, New Zealand, and USA (with the aim of targeting Indian market).
Best option for the current financial condition is going with A339s (8-10 jets) which is easy to induct, lower capital cost for maintenance, crew training. But better to not to go with A338s because of of thin Profit margin per flight, Less Pax, more range, same applies for B788, (Need to carry the entire aircraft gross weight with less pax, for a longer range which needs much fuel and ticket prices will be higher than competitors, if the ticket pricing is same as SG, MH, profit margin will be thin.)
Thanks
getting either an A339 or a A359 isnt going to be easy though. both have somewhat big backlogs.
UL could lease[short term] some to(at least) get an experience on the operations of those 2 aircraft.
correct me if I'm wrong though,
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: